Re: [Openocd-development] parport.cfg question

2008-11-17 Thread Duane Ellis
Uwe Hermann wrote: > [parallel port address: 0xc8b8] That seems just wrong. The only time I've seen that type of address was a Long Time ago in some auto-configure port thing that went bad I know these addresses 378 - make sense. - LPT1 278 - make sense. - LPT2 I've heard of this one. 3BC -

Re: [Openocd-development] parport.cfg question

2008-11-17 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:17:39AM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote: > Hi, > > why does src/target/interface/parport.cfg use the > > parport_port 0xc8b8 > > config? Shouldn't that be either "0" or "0x3f8" rather? > I've never seen that one used anywhere, and it definately doesn't > work on my (standar

Re: [Openocd-development] parport.cfg question

2008-11-07 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:17:39AM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote: > Hi, > > why does src/target/interface/parport.cfg use the > > parport_port 0xc8b8 > > config? Shouldn't that be either "0" or "0x3f8" rather? ^ I mean 0x

[Openocd-development] parport.cfg question

2008-11-06 Thread Uwe Hermann
Hi, why does src/target/interface/parport.cfg use the parport_port 0xc8b8 config? Shouldn't that be either "0" or "0x3f8" rather? I've never seen that one used anywhere, and it definately doesn't work on my (standard PC) parallel port ("0" does work). Thanks, Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.