> > At the moment even if the router claim to support QoS i had very bad
> > experiences, basically if someone is using eMule you cannot use VoIP
> > lines at all.
One very important rule to remember is that you want your shaping to be
the bottleneck. Your modem can prioritize all it wants, but if
Our testing shows PLC+JB alone will suffice. We tested multiple
simultanous downloads with p2p sortware, and audio was still good
roy
Den 28.3.2007 kl. 18:45 skrev Antonio Gallo:
> wich is the best xDSL router with QoS and prioritization that will
> allow
> a decent number of VoIP Lines (4 o
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 09:55 -0700, Chris Albertson wrote:
> I used a Linux box with two Ethernet cards installed. Linux
> makes a very nice firewall. I used this www.shorewall.net to
> configure the Linux firewall. Shorewall is very powerfull and
> a little bit "cisco-like" in the way you set up
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 18:45:58 +0200,
Antonio Gallo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wich is the best xDSL router with QoS and prioritization that will allow
> a decent number of VoIP Lines (4 or more) to be used even if all people
> are downloading via FTP and eMule to be used with OpenPBX?
>
>
I used a Linux box with two Ethernet cards installed. Linux
makes a very nice firewall. I used this www.shorewall.net to
configure the Linux firewall. Shorewall is very powerfull and
a little bit "cisco-like" in the way you set up zones and rules.
Any low-end PC can make a good router but you
wich is the best xDSL router with QoS and prioritization that will allow
a decent number of VoIP Lines (4 or more) to be used even if all people
are downloading via FTP and eMule to be used with OpenPBX?
At the moment even if the router claim to support QoS i had very bad
experiences, basically