On Sun, Feb 02, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2003, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
>>> openpkg-re/vcheck vc.chkrootkit
>>> openpkg-src/chkrootkit chkrootkit.spec
>>> openpkg-web news.txt
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> upgrading package: chkrootkit 0.
b 2003 10:03:40 - 1.12
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
Group:System
License: GPL
-Version: 0.39a
-Release: 20030201
+Version: 0.39
+Release: 20030203
# list of sources
Source0: ftp://ftp.pangeia.com.br/pub/seg/
# package version
-%define V_glib 2.2.0
+%define V_glib 2.2.1
%define V_gtk_major 2.2
# package information
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
Group:Algorithm
License: GPL
Version: %{V_glib}
-Release: 20030131
+Release: 20030203
1.131
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@
# o any cc(1)
# the package version and release
-%define V_openpkg 20030202
-%define R_openpkg 20030202
+%define V_openpkg 20030203
+%define R_openpkg 20030203
# the used software versions
%define
# package version
-%define V_pango 1.2.0
+%define V_pango 1.2.1
%define V_glib_major 2.2
%define V_gtk_major 2.2
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Group:XWindow
License: GPL
Version: %{V_pango}
-Release: 20021222
+Release:
V_vl 6.1
%define V_vs 61
-%define V_pl 316
+%define V_pl 317
# package information
Name: vim
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Group:Editor
License: Charityware
Version: %{V_vl}.%{V_pl}
-Release: 20030202
+Release: 20030203
here}
-Release: 20030202
+Release: 20030203
# list of sources
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Log/Log-Dispatch-%{V_log_dispatch}.tar.gz
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
Source7: rtupgrade
Source8: rtapachectl
Source9: rt-mailgate.c
+Source10:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
> > Can you explain what it actually broke? Which platform? And why is 0.39a
> > a non-release grade version? Both according to the website and FTP
> > server 0.39a looks like a bugfix version of 0.39 and not an "alpha" or
> > whatever vers
c/openpkg-tool/openpkg-tool.spec3 Feb 2003 12:58:55 -
1.32
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [PLUS]
Group:Bootstrapping
License: GPL
-Version: 20030124
-Release: 20030124
+Version: 20030203
+Release: 20030203
#
g), the ``su'' doesn't seem to be executing at all
> for non root users. It is executing that part of the script (I added a
> command to copy $tmpfile after the ``su'' command, and that worked).
Yes, there was another subtle bug with
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003, Michael van Elst wrote:
> [...]
> prefer packages matching target name over packages providing target
> name to resolve ambiguities
Thanks a lot, Michael.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECT
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Michael van Elst
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
Group:Editor
License: GPL
-Version: 0.5.6
-Release: 20030113
+Version: 0.6.0
+Release: 20030203
# list of sources
Source0: http://as.is.eu.cw.com/source/as-cui-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ .
patch -p0 <
V_base2.0
+%define V_src 2.0
+%define V_texmf 2.0
# package information
Name: tetex
@@ -38,17 +38,16 @@
Group:Text
License: GPL
Version: %{V_src}
-Release: 20030116
+Release: 20030203
# package op
nse 1.1
Version: 3.3.1a
-Release: 20030201
+Release: 20030203
# list of sources
Source0:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v%{version}/bin/jakarta-tomcat-%{versi
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Michael van Elst
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
- - -
chkrootkit0.39 0.39a
coreutils 4.5.4 4.5.5
gcc33 20030127 20030203
hevea 2002.09.172002.11.06[1
.4
-Release: 20030117
+Version: 4.5.5
+Release: 20030203
# list of sources
Source0: ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils/coreutils-%{version}.tar.bz2
Patch0: coreutils.patch
-Patch1: coreutils-dirent.patch
# build information
Prefix: %{l
-web openpkg$ Date: 03-Feb-2003 21:29:55
Branch: HEAD Handle: 2003020320295302
Modified files:
openpkg-re/vcheck vc.gcc33
openpkg-src/gcc33 gcc33.spec
openpkg-web news.txt
Log:
upgrade to snapshot 20030203
Summary
http://www.tightvnc.org/
+Vendor: Constantin Kaplinsky
+Packager: The OpenPKG Project
+Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
+Group:XWindow
+License: GPL
+Version: 1.2.8
+Release: 20030203
+
+# list of sources
+Source0:
http://osdn.dl.sou
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re
sion: 6.0.9
-Release: 20030131
+Release: 20030203
# list of sources
Source0: ftp://ftp.am-utils.org/pub/am-utils/am-utils-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -77,6 +77,12 @@
echo "ac_cv_lib_ldap_ldap_open=\${ac_cv_lib_ldap_ldap_open='no'}"
ec
pfile after the ``su'' command, and that worked).
>
>Yes, there was another subtle bug with the tempfile stuff. Can you
>retry with openpkg-20030203-20030203? I hope this is fixed now, too.
This one works -- after I tracked down a subtle bug of my own in the
interaction between our LD
8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
Group:Editor
License: GPL
-Version: 0.6.7
-Release: 20030131
+Version: 0.6.8
+Release: 20030203
# package options
%option with_micono
@@ .
patch -p0 <
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-02-04 07:22
Tracking Duration: 0:21:50 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:686 sources (455 packages)
Tracking Result: 652 up-to-date, 9 out-dated, 25 error
The following 9 sources were determined to be out-da
25 matches
Mail list logo
