6,15 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
Group:Network
License: GPL
-Version: 1.2.2
-Release: 20030811
+Version: %{V_api_c}
+Release: 20030912
+
+# package options
+%option with_perl no
# list of sources
-Source0: http://www.
One of the most confusing areas in RPM is certainly the %setup macro and
how its options interact with each other. I found myself cut & pasting
existing examples or doing trail & error for every new package. I've now
read the (incomplete) documentation and (more complete ;-) source code
in-depth an
-> 20030912
Summary:
RevisionChanges Path
1.27+1 -1 openpkg-re/vcheck/vc.perl-net
1.43+3 -3 openpkg-src/perl-net/perl-net.spec
1.6520 +1 -0 openpkg-web/news.
08:19:29 - 1.29
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [PLUS]
Group:Converter
License: GPL
-Version: 0.33
-Release: 20030408
+Version: 0.34
+Release: 20030912
# list of sources
Source0: http://www.winfield.demon.
-> 20030912
Summary:
RevisionChanges Path
1.10+2 -2 openpkg-re/vcheck/vc.perl-gtk
1.18+4 -4 openpkg-src/perl-gtk/perl-gtk.spec
1.6522 +1 -0 openpkg-web/news.
20030908 -> 20030912
Summary:
RevisionChanges Path
1.8 +1 -1 openpkg-re/vcheck/vc.mplayer
1.28+2 -2 openpkg-src/mplayer/mplayer.spec
1.6523 +1 -0 openpkg-web/news.
-> 20030912
Summary:
RevisionChanges Path
1.16+1 -1 openpkg-re/vcheck/vc.perl-tk
1.29+3 -3 openpkg-src/perl-tk/perl-tk.spec
1.6524 +1 -0 openpkg-web/news.
+ openpkg-re/vcheck/vc.pgadmin 12 Sep 2003 08:31:44 - 1.22
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
}
prog pgadmin = {
- version = 20030909
+ version = 20030912
url = http://www.pgadmin.org/snapshots/src/
regex = pgadmin3-src-(__VER__)\.tar\.gz
}
@@ .
patch -p0 <&l
V_vl 6.2
%define V_vs 62
-%define V_pl 80
+%define V_pl 90
# package information
Name: vim
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
Group:Editor
License: Charityware
Version: %{V_vl}.%{V_pl}
-Release: 20030911
+Release: 20030912
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
/wine/wine.spec15 Aug 2003 13:58:33 - 1.9
+++ openpkg-src/wine/wine.spec12 Sep 2003 10:04:13 - 1.10
@@ -32,8 +32,8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
Group:X11
License: LGPL
-Version: 20030813
-Release: 20030815
+Versi
/openpkg/HISTORY
$ cvs diff -u -r1.44 -r1.45 HISTORY
--- openpkg-src/openpkg/HISTORY 11 Sep 2003 19:15:30 - 1.44
+++ openpkg-src/openpkg/HISTORY 12 Sep 2003 10:09:48 - 1.45
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
2003
+20030912 do not re
%{V_djbdns}
-Release: 20030808
+Release: 20030912
# list of sources
Source0: http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/djbdns-%{V_djbdns}.tar.gz
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@
djbdns is a collection of Domain Name System tools.
%prep
-%setup0 -q
-%setup1 -q -a 1
oup:Misc
License: GPL
Version: %{V_linkchecker}
-Release: 20030829
+Release: 20030912
# list of sources
Source0:
http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/linkchecker/linkchecker-%{V_linkchecker}.tar.gz
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@
LinkChecker checks your HTML docu
-Version: 5.0.90
-Release: 20030801
+Version: 5.0.91
+Release: 20030912
# package options
%option with_legacy no
@@ -73,13 +73,17 @@
-e 's;^\(install-exec-local:\).*;\1;' \
-e 's;^\(bin_PROGRAMS =\);\1 su;' \
/openpkg/HISTORY
$ cvs diff -u -r1.45 -r1.46 HISTORY
--- openpkg-src/openpkg/HISTORY 12 Sep 2003 10:09:48 - 1.45
+++ openpkg-src/openpkg/HISTORY 12 Sep 2003 11:54:41 - 1.46
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
2003
+20030912 unconditionally
46
+++ openpkg-src/openpkg/HISTORY 12 Sep 2003 12:33:47 - 1.47
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
2003
+20030912 allow "-bb --short-circuit" for continuing building a binary package
20030912 unconditionally remove temporary files of generated/executed scripts
20030912
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-re
3.2.1
-Release: 20030910
+Release: 20030912
# package library options (each 'yes' builds more libraries)
%option with_shared no
@@ -304,11 +304,13 @@
# copy binaries, headers, and then libraries to their target
%{l_shtool} install -c -s -m
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003, Bill Campbell wrote:
> I'm attempting to build OpenPKG release 1.3 on OS X/Darwin, and it builds
> with one minor hack in gzip to keep it from trying to use the assembler.
> Unfortunately once it's built, rpm fails when attempting to rebuild or
> install SRPMS with the error:
ctions into the .cc
> file which used them. They're basically patterned off the glibc
> implementation.
For the misising functions at least inside the RPM libraries, there
is now librpmmisc.a starting with openpkg-20030912-20030912.
> As for the Glob() function... this is declared in /u
12 Sep 2003 13:18:22 - 1.48
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
2003
+20030912 remove per-package %{_sourcedir} and %{_specdir} directories on --rebuild
20030912 allow "-bb --short-circuit" for continuing building a binary package
20030912 unconditionally remove temporary files of ge
Request 253 was acted upon.
This is an automatically generated message.
URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/253
Ticket: [OpenPKG #253]
Subject: [bootstrap] missing header files
Requestors: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n: %{V_here}
-Release: 20030830
+Release: 20030912
# list of sources
Source0: http://www.fping.com/download/fping-%{V_real}.tar.gz
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{l_make} %{l_mflags} install AM_MAKEFLAGS="DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT"
$ cvs diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 inetutils.spec
--- openpkg-src/inetutils/inetutils.spec 21 Aug 2003 13:18:02 - 1.1
+++ openpkg-src/inetutils/inetutils.spec 12 Sep 2003 14:30:29 - 1.2
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
Group:Network
License: G
/openpkg/HISTORY
$ cvs diff -u -r1.48 -r1.49 HISTORY
--- openpkg-src/openpkg/HISTORY 12 Sep 2003 13:18:22 - 1.48
+++ openpkg-src/openpkg/HISTORY 12 Sep 2003 14:56:17 - 1.49
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
2003
+20030912 add -pi
Request 240 was acted upon.
This is a comment. It is not sent to the Requestor(s).
_
URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/240
Ticket: [OpenPKG #240]
Subject: rpmtool makes wrong assumption with $isgcc
Requestor
Request 240 was acted upon.
This is an automatically generated message.
URL: https://rt.openpkg.org/id/240
Ticket: [OpenPKG #240]
Subject: rpmtool makes wrong assumption with $isgcc
Requestors: [EMAIL PR
8 +32,8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [BASE]
Group:SGML
License: LGPL
-Version: 1.0.32
-Release: 20030810
+Version: 1.0.33
+Release: 20030912
# list of sources
Source0: ftp://xmlsoft.org/libxslt-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ .
patch -p0 <
istribution: OpenPKG [EVAL]
+Group:Terminal
+License: GPL
+Version: 2.15
+Release: 20030912
+
+# list of sources
+Source0: http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/which/which-%{version}.tar.gz
+
+# build information
+Prefix: %{l_prefix}
+BuildRoot:
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-09-12 19:30
Tracking Duration: 0:29:46 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:871 sources (575 packages)
Tracking Result: 830 up-to-date, 7 out-dated, 34 error
The following 7 sources were determined to be out-da
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@
Distribution: OpenPKG [BASE]
Group:Language
License: GPL/Artistic
-Version: 20030910
-Release: 20030910
+Version: 20030912
+Release: 20030912
# package options
%option with_libxmlno
@@ .
patch -p0
Compiler
License: GPL
Version: %{V_full}
-Release: 20030909
+Release: 20030912
# package options
%option with_cxx yes
@@ .
patch -p0 <<'@@ .'
Index: openpkg-web/news.txt
=
Hi,
I've packaged apt4rpm, a port of the apt package manager used by Debian
that runs on top of RPM.
The SRPM is available at
http://apt.cis.ksu.edu/solaris/apt/SRPMS.cis/apt-0.5.5cnc6-20030912.src.rpm
The packaging effort was done on Solaris, so there may be quirks
relocating to Linux or
How do the University of Washington's licensing terms for the 'pine'
email client agree with the OpenPKG mission? I know there are several
specifications for commercial software in the repository, but this isn't
quite the same as the UW policy on distributing patches.
If the licensing terms are co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
| I've now tried to fix this in the latest OSSP platform snapshot
| which is now included in openpkg-20030911-20030911 and higher (see
| http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=12153 for details). Can you try this
| one and give fe
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2003-09-13 07:29
Tracking Duration: 0:28:42 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:871 sources (575 packages)
Tracking Result: 827 up-to-date, 9 out-dated, 35 error
The following 9 sources were determined to be out-da
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003, Matt Hoosier wrote:
> How do the University of Washington's licensing terms for the 'pine'
> email client agree with the OpenPKG mission? I know there are several
> specifications for commercial software in the repository, but this isn't
> quite the same as the UW policy on d
40 matches
Mail list logo
