On Thu, Mar 24, 2005, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:39:05PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
>
> > Haha. I was wondering about that when I was doing it. Ok, well, here
> > is the debug from the -a -U then. However, it still seemed to have an
> > issue.
>
> Ok. The bug is far
- - -
blender 2.34 2.35 [1]
cdk 4.9.11-20050308 4.9.11-20050323
kde-arts 1.3.1 1.4.0
kde-base 3.2.3 3.3.2
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:39:05PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
> Haha. I was wondering about that when I was doing it. Ok, well, here
> is the debug from the -a -U then. However, it still seemed to have an
> issue.
Ok. The bug is far away from what I thought.
The problem was that a requirem
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 22:10 +0100, Michael van Elst wrote:
> Ouch. I meant -U -a of course :-|
>
> -A -> select all packages in the index
> -a -> select all packages that are installed
>
Haha. I was wondering about that when I was doing it. Ok, well, here
is the debug from the -a -U then. How
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:09:12PM -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 11:40 -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
> > > Can you verify that 'openpkg build -u -A' doesn't show
> > > the same pecularities ?
> >
> > I'm running this now. I will let you know when it finishes. Thanks.
>
>
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 11:40 -0800, David M. Fetter wrote:
> > Can you verify that 'openpkg build -u -A' doesn't show
> > the same pecularities ?
>
> I'm running this now. I will let you know when it finishes. Thanks.
I attached the output for the -u -A run, but it seems to still show the
same i
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2005-03-23 18:51
Tracking Duration: 0:37:49 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:1492 sources (863 packages)
Tracking Result: 1389 up-to-date, 17 out-dated, 86 error
The following 17 sources were determined to be ou
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005, Michael Schloh wrote:
> 1.4.x is the stable version, so I've adjusted the vcheck strings.
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005, Michael Schloh wrote:
> > Log:
> > hack hardcoded values into vcheck strings, rather bad because next
> > release version checking will be silently disabled
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005, OpenPKG Version Tracker wrote:
>> squirrelmail 1.4.4 1.5.0
>> [5]
>> squirrelmail:avelsieve1.0.1 1.9.2
>> squirrelmail:gnupg2.0.1-1.4.2
