On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Also, how could I help you here ?
Since my patches include the diff from the original 4.2.1 (not patched
by boostrap) it could be difficult for you ?
May be I should add the patch in rpm.patch.porting and make a new try
before you start working on
On Mon, May 16, 2005, Bill Campbell wrote:
I finally got around to moving our news to a fresh server running
inn-2.4.2-2.3.0, and found one thing that I either don't understand, or
it's a bug in the rc.inn file. Specifically I think the %quarterly section
the line reading:
rcService
ASAP.
I finish the build with the 'patched' rpm.patch.porting but the log
finish without openpkg-2.3.1-2.3.1.src.rpm ;(
Normal ?
++ '[' -f /QOpenSys/builds/openpkg-2.3.1-2.3.1.src/rpmtool ']'
++ echo /QOpenSys/builds/openpkg-2.3.1-2.3.1.src/rpmtool
+ cp
Ok found the problem about the 'missing' src rpm.
rpm couldn't find group for files included in
/QOpenSys/builds/openpkg-2.3.1-2.3.1 (PASE strangeness).
BTW, the patch is attached.
I make a new build now that groups are corrected and tell you more
2005/5/17, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
[...]
Btw, in the patch I see:
+#ifndef OPENPKG_AIX
#include stdio.h
+#endif
Here AIX is just kidding, isn't it? ;-)
stdio.h should be available everywhere, including under AIX...
Ralf S. Engelschall
Yes but some definitions here duplicate with the one from gcc stdio.h.
/usr/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I.. -I../build
-I../rpmdb -I../rpmio -I../popt -DOPENPKG -DOPENPKG_AIX
-I/QOpenSys/tmp/openpkg-2.3.1/zlib-1.2.2
-I/QOpenSys/tmp/openpkg-2.3.1/bzip2-1.0.2
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Yes but some definitions here duplicate with the one from gcc stdio.h.
/usr/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I.. -I../build
-I../rpmdb -I../rpmio -I../popt -DOPENPKG -DOPENPKG_AIX
-I/QOpenSys/tmp/openpkg-2.3.1/zlib-1.2.2
Where can I check that ?
Could it be related to bison ?
If there is a problem why could I build all the previous files using stdio.h ?
Also didn't have problems to build simple c file including the
2005/5/17, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Where can I check that ?
Could it be related to bison ?
H yes, it can be. It depends what code Bison had generated.
If there is a problem why could I build all the previous files using stdio.h ?
Also didn't have problems to build simple c
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Just a quick note to say the build of openpkg bootstrap 2.3.1 with my AIX
patches has succeed.
Installed, will try now some build, may be first binutils, m4, bison and
perl :)
Congratulations and thanks alot for OpenPKG AIX.
Regards,
Michael
--
Well, we should wait if my first build works and later we should
probably works on AIX patches for many of the packages and send them
back to developpers :)
2005/5/17, Michael Schloh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Just a quick note to say the build of openpkg
Well I found the problem :
In the /QOpenSys/openpkg/etc/openpkg/rpmmacros I found :
%l_build_path%(if [ -d %{l_prefix}/lib/openpkg/override ];
then echo %{l_prefix}/lib/openpkg/override:;
fi)%{l_prefix}/bin:%{l_prefix}/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin
In my case It should ge like
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Ok my first build failed since I didn't have gcc yet ;(
Question: How did I make my current gcc visible ?
Build all packages with openpkg rpm --rebuild --define 'use_cc
/path/to/gcc' ... unless you have built and installed the OpenPKG
gcc package. From
Same thing for ld ?
Also how did I 'insert' my hacked uname ?
2005/5/17, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Ok my first build failed since I didn't have gcc yet ;(
Question: How did I make my current gcc visible ?
Build all packages with
Also did you recommand using the native AIX LD or the binutils 2.16
GNU LD on AIX ?
May be a l_ld could be usefull also ?
2005/5/17, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Same thing for ld ?
Also how did I 'insert' my hacked uname ?
2005/5/17, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Same thing for ld ?
Yes, for both make, binutils and gcc.
Also how did I 'insert' my hacked uname ?
The only chance is by replacing your system uname(1) command directly in
place.
Ralf S. Engelschall
ok, so I should also place the 'ld' in the classic PATH, ie /bin ?
2005/5/17, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Same thing for ld ?
Yes, for both make, binutils and gcc.
Also how did I 'insert' my hacked uname ?
The only chance is by
Or I could hack %l_build_path in rpmmacros (~/rpmmacros may be) until
the mandatory tools are ready ?
2005/5/17, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ok, so I should also place the 'ld' in the classic PATH, ie /bin ?
2005/5/17, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Or I could hack %l_build_path in rpmmacros (~/rpmmacros may be) until
the mandatory tools are ready ?
Hmmm.. if it works and you really need the own ld, then hacking
%l_build_path is certainly the better possibility.
own ld ?
Do you means AIX LD or GNU LD (via binutils ?)
2005/5/17, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
Or I could hack %l_build_path in rpmmacros (~/rpmmacros may be) until
the mandatory tools are ready ?
Hmmm.. if it works and you really
BTW, the make 3.80 is built (need to hack my custom perl config but
usual in bootstrap time :)
m4 is on the fly
2005/5/17, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
own ld ?
Do you means AIX LD or GNU LD (via binutils ?)
2005/5/17, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri
bison, m4, make are built.
gawk is building.
What next ?
gcc or binutils ?
2005/5/17, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW, the make 3.80 is built (need to hack my custom perl config but
usual in bootstrap time :)
m4 is on the fly
2005/5/17, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
own ld ?
BTW, the first binaries are here :
http://rpm.world.free.fr/rpms/openpkg-2.3.0-powerpc-2.0-Qop/
2005/5/17, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
bison, m4, make are built.
gawk is building.
What next ?
gcc or binutils ?
2005/5/17, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BTW, the make 3.80 is
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
bison, m4, make are built.
gawk is building.
What next ?
gcc or binutils ?
Always tries as early as possible to build (in this order) make,
binutils, gcc. After this you reached the better side of the world
;-) and can proceed with whatever you
binutils is running right now.
gcc will follow after (probably next week since I won't have access to
my dev system until Monday).
2005/5/17, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
bison, m4, make are built.
gawk is building.
What next ?
gcc
The actual RPMS for Linux for example are named :
gawk-3.1.4-2.3.0.ix86-suse9-openpkg.rpm
For AIX 5.2 / PASE :
gawk-3.1.4-2.3.0.powerpc-2.0-Qop.rpm
Why 2.0 and Qop and not aix5.2.0 and qopensysopenpkg ?
ie :
gawk-3.1.4-2.3.0.powerpc-aix5.2.0-Qopensysopenpkg.rpm
Regards
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2005-05-17 18:55
Tracking Duration: 0:39:34 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:1588 sources (884 packages)
Tracking Result: 1487 up-to-date, 17 out-dated, 84 error
The following 17 sources were determined to be
The rpm build of gcc detected newly created binutils :
+ CONFIG_SHELL=/QOpenSys/openpkg/lib/openpkg/bash
+ ../configure --cache-file=./config.cache
--srcdir=/QOpenSys/openpkg/RPM/TMP/gcc-3.4.3/obj/..
--prefix=/QOpenSys/openpkg --exec-prefix=/QOpenSys/openpkg
On Tue, May 17, 2005, Henri Gomez wrote:
The actual RPMS for Linux for example are named :
gawk-3.1.4-2.3.0.ix86-suse9-openpkg.rpm
For AIX 5.2 / PASE :
gawk-3.1.4-2.3.0.powerpc-2.0-Qop.rpm
Why 2.0 and Qop and not aix5.2.0 and qopensysopenpkg ?
ie :
uploaded binutils :)
gcc build is running
2005/5/17, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
binutils is running right now.
gcc will follow after (probably next week since I won't have access to
my dev system until Monday).
2005/5/17, Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, May
More infos for you :
uname -s
AIX
uname -r
2.0.0
uname -v
5
uname -p
powerpc
uname -m
0044000420CA
2005/5/17, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
/QOpenSys/openpkg/lib/openpkg/shtool platform -n -L -S -C + -F
%ap-%sp
== powerpc-2.0
/QOpenSys/openpkg/lib/openpkg/shtool platform
= AIX
/QOpenSys/openpkg/lib/openpkg/shtool platform -n -L -S -C + -F
%ap-%sp
== powerpc-2.0
/QOpenSys/openpkg/lib/openpkg/shtool platform
= AIX 2.0.0 (powerpc)
On my Suse SLES 9 (ppc64) :
sh ./shtool platform
= SuSE 9 (ppc64)
sh ./shtool platform -n -L -S -C + -F %ap-%sp
ppc64-suse9alaska
This
OpenPKG Version Tracking Report
===
Reporting Time:2005-05-18 06:52
Tracking Duration: 0:37:49 (H:M:S)
Tracking Input:1588 sources (884 packages)
Tracking Result: 1491 up-to-date, 21 out-dated, 76 error
The following 21 sources were determined to be
33 matches
Mail list logo
