Re: Postgressql and libpgtcl

2003-07-19 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003, Michael van Elst wrote: > > You need to enable tcl-support with configure. I am working on it... > > or rather I will be working on it when I have fixed the tcl package :-) > > postgresql-7.3.3-20030719 now (optionally) builds a libpgtcl.a. But I think we have to add some en

Re: Postgressql and libpgtcl

2003-07-19 Thread Michael van Elst
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003, Michael van Elst wrote: > You need to enable tcl-support with configure. I am working on it... > or rather I will be working on it when I have fixed the tcl package :-) postgresql-7.3.3-20030719 now (optionally) builds a libpgtcl.a. -- ,eM""=.a"-.

Re: Postgressql and libpgtcl

2003-07-19 Thread Michael van Elst
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > I cannot remember why, but I've removed TCL support some time ago. I > think it was when pgaccess was moved out of the official distribution > and into its own project. Does the following patch work for you? It at > least builds for me, but I've n

Re: Postgressql and libpgtcl

2003-07-19 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003, Bill Campbell wrote: > Is there any reason why a ``with_tcl'' option isn't supported on the > current postgresql? I'm looking at pgaccess, a tcl/tk based tool which > requires this library, and am hacking on the postgresql.spec file to add > this option (the main trick seems

Re: Postgressql and libpgtcl

2003-07-18 Thread Bill Campbell
Is there any reason why a ``with_tcl'' option isn't supported on the current postgresql? I'm looking at pgaccess, a tcl/tk based tool which requires this library, and am hacking on the postgresql.spec file to add this option (the main trick seems to be getting the CPPFLAGS to include the tcl heade