Emacs installs fine, but when I try to run it I only get a text-mode
emacs. This isn't really useful since only a small margin of our userbase
knows how to use a text-mode emacs. How do I compile it with graphical
support (and shouldn't this be default)?
--
// Mark Gjøl
Is it better to abide by
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emacs installs fine, but when I try to run it I only get a text-mode
emacs. This isn't really useful since only a small margin of our userbase
knows how to use a text-mode emacs. How do I compile it with graphical
support (and shouldn't this be
Good thought. Yes, $prefix is on a mounted file system. But that is a mandatory
requirement for us since we need to
allow many users to have access to this openpkg instance in that fashion.
I might also mention that openpkg-1.3.1-1.3.1 did not complain about this.
Any thoughts about how to get
To really make your day, here are the two problems I encountered when trying to
upgrade to openpkg-20031006-20031006 on
RedHat 9 from 1.3.1 (which I had previously upgraded from 1.3.0).
1) Problem building if beecrypt-devel-2.2.0-8 package is installed on RedHat 9: If
this package (which is
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:45:12AM -0400, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
Good thought. Yes, $prefix is on a mounted file system. But that is a mandatory
requirement for us since we need to
allow many users to have access to this openpkg instance in that fashion.
I might also mention that
that the /usr/include/beecrypt (v2.2.0) is ahead of the within-package beecrypt
(v3.1.0) which causes the following
problems:
[...]
Fixed with openpkg-20031008-20031008 (see
http://cvs.openpkg.org/chngview?cn=12699 for details).
Thanks for the hint.
[...]
2) Problem running OpenPKG rpm v4.2.1
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
[...]
If I run the above test program on our RedHat 9 box on a NFS filesystem
mounted from a NetApp filer or a Solaris 8 box, it works fine (rv=0).
Same on a local filesystem. But if I run it on a NFS filesystem mounted
from a FreeBSD or Linux
