On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005, OpenPKG wrote:
OpenPKG Registry finally launched!
[...]
The first questions pop up around the OpenPKG Registry.
We will try hard to answer all of them to you. Let me
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, David M. Fetter wrote:
While I try to keep up on all the news and such here, I still miss a few
things here and there. However, I think that perhaps a few things may
not have been discussed like the specifics of what things and when
exactly they would be going offline
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
And please do not hesitate to give us YOUR important opinions,
complains, suggestions, wishes, etc. Either state them in public on
openpkg-users@openpkg.org or in private to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We will try to answer all of them.
Hi Ralf!
What I am missing are
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
And please do not hesitate to give us YOUR important opinions,
complains, suggestions, wishes, etc. Either state them in public on
openpkg-users@openpkg.org or in private to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We will try to answer all of them.
What I am
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Sorry for the delay. RSYNC access is resurrected. The difference is just
that plain anonymous-RSYNC is not possible because rsync(1) doesn't
support both anonymous and non-anonymous in parallel. If you have
registered with [EMAIL PROTECTED] you can now RSYNC again
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005, Steffen Weinreich wrote:
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Sorry for the delay. RSYNC access is resurrected. The difference is just
that plain anonymous-RSYNC is not possible because rsync(1) doesn't
support both anonymous and non-anonymous in parallel. If you have
There is a new obmtool [1] available from ZfOS [2] for use in the new
OpenPKG Registry world order. New features are mirror support, choice
of download tool with fallbacks and user/pass support. The latter
especially understands and obeys the URL rewriting of those instances
who utilize that
