from building on at least: FC3, RH3.4, RH4.4
(removing patch to lua/Makefile.in fixes the problem on these platforms)
is this package still maintainted ? if not what is the process to
become a maintainer ?
Best Regards,
Olivier Kaloudoff
directory, but there are still
missing packages, that i download by hand before rpmbuilding -ba ..
any comments well apreciated :-)
Olivier Kaloudoff
__
OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
if there
are restrictions to installing a package as openpkg user ;-)
Olivier Kaloudoff
__
OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
It's just missing BuildPreReq: zlib
(and probably PreReq: zlib too)
__
OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
whether --with-modules was given.
+ if test ${with_modules+set} = set; then
Olivier Kaloudoff
__
OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users
to unpack into directory
openpkg-20070322-20070322.src
Olivier Kaloudoff
Saint Raphael
__
OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
-whoson.patch: No
such file or directory
RPM build errors:
Bad file: /openpkg/RPM/SRC/postfix/postfix-2.4.0-whoson.patch: No such
file or directory
why does not rpm check for the patch file before beginning of the
build ?
Olivier Kaloudoff
Saint Raphael
, but this one
is rather nice :-) )
I'm sorry I did not take time to investigate on the problem yet.
Here is the build log if someone want to look at it;
http://pastebin.ca/493015
Olivier Kaloudoff
Saint Raphael
__
OpenPKG
The permissions should be set like this;
chgrp postdrop /openpkg/sbin/postqueue /openpkg/sbin/postdrop
chmod 755 /openpkg/sbin/postqueue /openpkg/sbin/postdrop
chmod g+s /openpkg/sbin/postqueue /openpkg/sbin/postdrop
Olivier Kaloudoff
Saint Raphael
Ralf,
building postfix on a brand new install (debian etch), postfix
refuses to start with the following error;
minimal_etch:/# postfix start
postfix: fatal: file /openpkg/etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter
default_privs: user root has privileged user ID
minimal_etch:/# type postfix
openpkg packages. Afterall, no binaries seems to need
the root right, I had the habit of installing rpm as root, so I kept,
wrongly, this habit with openpkg..
Hope the lazy admins can sometime go to paradise in spite of their
lazyness :-)
Best Regards,
Olivier Kaloudoff
/openpkg rpm
# fetching XML/RDF index from URL
ftp://ftp.openpkg.org/current/SRC/00INDEX.rdf
# using internal XML/RDF parser
openpkg:build:FATAL: an I/O error occured
any hint ?
Olivier Kaloudoff
Saint Raphael
06 20 65 71 33
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
[...]
for the moment, on the i386, I have to create two virtual packages,
as suggested by Bill (binutils and gcc).
A gcc package should be enough as this is the only one requiring
binutils. OTOH, is GCC or Binutils the actual problem under
http://www.kalou.net/openpkg/openpkg-build-binutils-failed.20070604.txt
Ah, ok. I see. Some incompatibilities with the system headers. This is
usually easy to workaround, but unfortunately not blindly without system
access. One has to find the defintions in /usr/include and then apply a
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
Yes, for fixing those problems I really need direct access to the
platform as I have to poke around in system headers and try many things
manually.
Porting GNU binutils over to Darwin sounds like a big enough task
with eyes open, so probably not worth trying to do
Hello Doug,
don't know why openpkg builds freetype using make setup,
as the documentation for freetype tells (docs/INSTALL.UNIX) to use
./configure for any Unix system, including OSX.
maybe an old building system still working on most platforms ?
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Doug
Hello members,
who can I send my updated ssh public keys to be able to login via
cvs ?
Regards,
Olivier Kaloudoff
__
OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
User Communication List
17 matches
Mail list logo
