Ouch. We just barely started rolling out new servers with 2-Stable-20061018. Hmmmm. This doesn't bode well for us.
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 21:07 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007, David M. Fetter wrote: > > > I get this message if I try to install both gnupg and libtasn1: > > > > file /usr/local/share/info/dir from install of libtasn1-0.3.6-2.20061018 > > conflicts with file from package gnupg-1.4.6-2.20061207 > > > > The libtasn1 package is needed for gnutls. Can this be fixed and > > updated please? Also, how much longer do we have before > > 2-Stable-20061018 is not supported in this fashion (if any)? > > Well, 2-STABLE-20061018 actually already went end of live with the > February 2007 snapshot. But just take gnupg-1.4.7-2.20070319 and > libtasn1-0.3.9-2.20070319 from 2-STABLE. There I already don't see this > problem any longer. But especially because of those support pains with > 2-STABLE we've already prepared a replacement offering based on the > E1.0-SOLID branch. Expect an announcement soon. > > Ralf S. Engelschall > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.engelschall.com > > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenPKG http://openpkg.org > User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org > -- David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
