Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] cpsv: standardize arrival callback API(s) with SAF syntax [#561]

2013-12-12 Thread Sirisha Alla
Mahesh, I have not done a line by line review of the code but have run some tests. Below are my comments: 1) If saCkptInitialize_2 is invoked with wrong version, version parameter is not being filled up according to the standard initialize API definitions. 2) If TrackCallback is provided as

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] cpsv: standardize arrival callback API(s) with SAF syntax [#561]

2013-12-12 Thread A V Mahesh
Sirisha, Thank you for the review Comments 1,2 3 are the this enhancement related , so I will address while pushing the patch, but comment 4 5 are existing problems , so can you please raise new ticket for those. -AVM On 12/12/2013 2:52 PM, Sirisha Alla wrote: Mahesh, I have not done

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for IMM: Implementation of NO_DANGLING flag [#49]

2013-12-12 Thread Anders Bjornerstedt
Need to correct myself in one of my own review comments. So far I have sent three mails. This is in the first one.' See below. Anders Bjornerstedt wrote: Hi Zoran. Server side patch looks much better :-) I still have some detail comments though. Not all of them in this mail, but just to let

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 4] clm: add to the information model and update config, scripts [#220]

2013-12-12 Thread Ramesh Betham
Ack, review comments inline [Ramesh]. Thanks, Ramesh. On 12/4/2013 6:30 PM, mathi.naic...@oracle.com wrote: opensaf.spec.in | 1 + osaf/services/saf/clmsv/config/Makefile.am | 3 +- osaf/services/saf/clmsv/config/clmna.conf

Re: [devel] [PATCH 2 of 4] clm: process clmna down at the clm server[#220]

2013-12-12 Thread Ramesh Betham
Ack. On 12/4/2013 6:30 PM, mathi.naic...@oracle.com wrote: osaf/services/saf/clmsv/clms/clms_evt.c | 3 +++ osaf/services/saf/clmsv/clms/clms_evt.h | 1 + osaf/services/saf/clmsv/clms/clms_mds.c | 18 ++ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [devel] [PATCH 3 of 4] clm: register with amf [#220]

2013-12-12 Thread Ramesh Betham
Ack with the following comments. + $(top_builddir)/osaf/libs/saf/libSaAmf/libSaAmf.la \ + $(top_builddir)/osaf/libs/saf/libSaImm/libSaImmOi.la [Ramesh]: Not required to add libSaImmOi.la + /* Detach from IPC */ + m_NCS_IPC_DETACH(clmna_cb-mbx, NULL, clmna_cb); [Ramesh]:

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for IMM: Implementation of NO_DANGLING flag [#49]

2013-12-12 Thread Zoran Milinkovic
Hi Neelakanta, 1. I will fix this. 2. That is correct behavior. If both objects are deleted in the same CCB, then it's possible to delete both of them. Number of same no dangling references in multivalue attribute does not matter on deletion objects. Having one reference is the same as having

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for IMM: Implementation of NO_DANGLING flag [#49]

2013-12-12 Thread Anders Bjornerstedt
Additional comments (fourth review mail for #49). 18) ImmModel::ccbObjectCreate Log message: AttrFlagIncludes(SA_IMM_ATTR_PERSISTENT)) == omi-second-mClassInfo-mAttrMap.end()) { LOG_NO(ERR_INVALID_PARAM:

[devel] [PATCH 2 of 2] mds: use TIPC segmentation/reassembly [#654]

2013-12-12 Thread Hans Feldt
osaf/libs/core/mds/include/mds_dt.h | 3 - osaf/libs/core/mds/include/mds_dt2c.h | 9 - osaf/libs/core/mds/mds_c_sndrcv.c | 9 +++-- osaf/libs/core/mds/mds_dt_tipc.c | 55 -- 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) MDS has its own

[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for java: Fix compiler warnings and treat warnings as errors [#649]

2013-12-12 Thread Anders Widell
Summary: java: Fix compiler warnings and treat warnings as errors [#649] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 649 Peer Reviewer(s): Mathi Pull request to: Affected branch(es): opensaf-4.2.x, opensaf-4.3.x, default(4.4) Development branch: default Impacted area

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for IMM: Implementation of NO_DANGLING flag [#49]

2013-12-12 Thread Anders Bjornerstedt
Need to correct my own review comments again. Just goes to show that this code is really hard to review. See below. Anders Bjornerstedt wrote: Additional comments (fourth review mail for #49). 18) ImmModel::ccbObjectCreate Log message:

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for IMM: Implementation of NO_DANGLING flag [#49]

2013-12-12 Thread Anders Bjornerstedt
Additional comments (fifth review mail for #49). This is the final mail for this RR, i.e. this set of patches. 21) ImmModel::ccbObjectModify +s1.clear(); +s2.clear(); +// Exclude objects for adding from the original object Better: //Create the set s1 of

[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for logsv: Remove dependency to shared file system [#152]

2013-12-12 Thread Lennart Lund
Summary: logsv: Remove dependency to shared file system Review request for Trac Ticket(s): [#152] Peer Reviewer(s): Mathi N, Hans F, Bertil E Pull request to: LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE Affected branch(es): 4.4 Development branch: IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL