Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: guard failed state file removal [#741]

2014-01-24 Thread praveen malviya
In the floated patch for #601 below mentioned log message is removed. After this patch do we require the removal of log message in #601 patch. Thanks, Praveen On 24-Jan-14 12:23 PM, Hans Feldt wrote: > osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/su.cc | 6 -- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletion

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amf: support for automatic comp instantiation and deletion [#597]

2014-01-24 Thread Hans Feldt
On 01/24/2014 05:06 AM, Nagendra Kumar wrote: >>> + (su_ptr->saAmfSUPresenceState == >>> +SA_AMF_PRESENCE_INSTANTIATED) && >> >> keep above expression on same line > > But the line is exceeding 80 lines when the line break is kept in the same > line. That s

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: guard failed state file removal [#741]

2014-01-24 Thread Hans Feldt
On 01/24/2014 09:56 AM, praveen malviya wrote: > In the floated patch for #601 below mentioned log message is removed. > After this patch do we require the removal of log message in #601 patch. Yes that part of 601 will be removed and replaced with this one. /Hans > > Thanks, > Praveen > On 24-J

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: guard failed state file removal [#741]

2014-01-24 Thread praveen malviya
Ack. Thanks, Praveen On 24-Jan-14 2:27 PM, Hans Feldt wrote: > > On 01/24/2014 09:56 AM, praveen malviya wrote: >> In the floated patch for #601 below mentioned log message is removed. >> After this patch do we require the removal of log message in #601 patch. > > Yes that part of 601 will be remo

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: escalate comp errors in quiesced HA state [#601]

2014-01-24 Thread praveen malviya
Ack. I think this change needs documentation. Reported #739 while testing this. Thanks Praveen On 10-Jan-14 2:44 PM, Hans Feldt wrote: > osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/comp.cc | 23 > +-- > osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/err.cc | 15 +++ >

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amf: support for automatic comp instantiation and deletion [#597]

2014-01-24 Thread Nagendra Kumar
So, you want to do revert this change and this knid of change from other places except the comments ? -Nagu > -Original Message- > From: Hans Feldt [mailto:hans.fe...@ericsson.com] > Sent: 24 January 2014 14:27 > To: Nagendra Kumar; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; Praveen Malviya; > Mathiva

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amf: support for automatic comp instantiation and deletion [#597]

2014-01-24 Thread Hans Feldt
Do what you think is best. This was minor comment on white space. But personally I don't think that we should break lines like in: > +(su_ptr->saAmfSUPresenceState == > + SA_AMF_PRESENCE_INSTANTIATED) && that makes the logic less understa

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for IMMTEST: fix IMM tests if 2PBE is enabled [#624]

2014-01-24 Thread Neelakanta Reddy
Hi Zoran, Reviewed and tested the patch. Ack. /Neel. On Tuesday 21 January 2014 05:43 PM, Zoran Milinkovic wrote: > Summary: IMMTEST: fix IMM tests if 2PBE is enabled [#624] > Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 624 > Peer Reviewer(s): Neelakanta > Pull request to: Zoran > Affected branch(es): ope

[devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: clear SI unassigned alarm when SI removed [#610]

2014-01-24 Thread Hans Feldt
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/si.cc | 8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) When an Application/SI is removed from the AMF model SI unassigned alarms will be generated. This patch clears those alarms since the SI is anyway being removed by an administrator. diff --git a/osa

[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for AMF #610

2014-01-24 Thread Hans Feldt
Summary: Clear alarms when SI is removed Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 601 Peer Reviewer(s): Praveen Pull request to: <> Affected branch(es): <> Development branch: <> Impacted area Impact y/n Docsn

[devel] [PATCH 1 of 2] IMM: Correct misleading comment in saImmOm_A_2_12.h (#747)

2014-01-24 Thread Anders Bjornerstedt
osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_12.h | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_12.h b/osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_12.h --- a/osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_12.h +++ b/osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_12.h @@ -54,9 +54,

[devel] [PATCH 0 of 2] Review Request for IMM: Correct comment in saImmOm_A_2_12.h & saImmOm_A_2_13.h (#747)

2014-01-24 Thread Anders Bjornerstedt
Summary: Correct misleading comments in saImmOm_A_2_12.h and saImmOm_A_2_13.h (#747) Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 747 Peer Reviewer(s): Neel Pull request to: Affected branch(es): 4.3, 4.4, default(4.5) Development branch: Impacted area Impact y/n ---

[devel] [PATCH 2 of 2] IMM: Correct misleading comment in saImmOm_A_2_13.h (#747)

2014-01-24 Thread Anders Bjornerstedt
osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_13.h | 7 --- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_13.h b/osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_13.h --- a/osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_13.h +++ b/osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_13.h @@ -46,11

[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for IMM: Clarify that completed-callback is meaningsless for appliers (#748)

2014-01-24 Thread Anders Bjornerstedt
Summary: IMM: Clarify that completed-callback isa meaningsless for appliers (#748) Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 748 Peer Reviewer(s): Neel Pull request to: Affected branch(es): 4.2;4.3;4.4;default(4.5) Development branch: Impacted area Impact y/n ---

[devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] IMM: Clarify that completed-callback is meaningsless for appliers (#748)

2014-01-24 Thread Anders Bjornerstedt
osaf/services/saf/immsv/README | 27 +++ 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README b/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README --- a/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README +++ b/osaf/services/saf/immsv/README @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ is genera