Hi,
Any info updated for testing this patch? Thanks
BR/Minh
On 4/18/2014 9:34 PM, Nagendra Kumar wrote:
Hi,
We have some failed test cases with this patch. Most probably, this
would be because of our configuration problem. We will get back early next
week. Can you please hold on this
Hi Minh,
We have corrected our configurations, and many failures are
gone, but we still have few failures to analyse. Please give us some more
time(one week more). We are working on it and we will update you.
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: minhchau
Ack with minor comment that nothing no warning is logged that the
configuration is probably invalid.
Thanks,
Hans
On 15 April 2014 12:48, praveen.malv...@oracle.com wrote:
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sgproc.cc | 6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Problem: Unlock of
Summary: Make system changes for ETFs and CLMD ETF
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 848
Peer Reviewer(s): Mathi Bertil
Pull request to: LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE
Affected branch(es): default
Development branch: default
Impacted area Impact y/n
osaf/services/saf/clmsv/config/ETF-CLMD.xml | 35 +
osaf/services/saf/clmsv/config/Makefile.am | 2 +
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Add an ETF file for CLMD. The contents corresponds to what we have in the
IMM XML file.
diff --git
Hi zoran,
Reviewed and tested the patch with minor comment.
Ack.
--strict must be mentioned in the help of immcfg.
/Neel.
- Original Message -
From: zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com
To: reddy.neelaka...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014
What about CLMNA? Should it be in a separate file or in this one (for CLMSV)?
Should the version of the CS type be set outside (as CT version) or should it
be 4.0.0 as before?
The CT and CS names does not match the current names, this will be a problem if
this information
is used for upgrades of
