Hi Vu
Ack with comment:
I think you should fix the get_attr_value() function before pushing.
What is the decision for placement of gcfg_classes.xml and gcfg_objects.xml?
Must of course also be fixed
Thanks
Lennart
> -Original Message-
> From: Vu Minh Nguyen
Hi Mathi,
Have you had time to look at this yet?
Regards, Vu.
>-Original Message-
>From: Vu Minh Nguyen [mailto:vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au]
>Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 8:49 AM
>To: anders.wid...@ericsson.com; lennart.l...@ericsson.com;
>mathi.naic...@oracle.com
>Cc:
On 11/03/16 17:23, praveen malviya wrote:
>
>
> On 10-Mar-16 5:31 PM, minh chau wrote:
>> To clarify my doubts: These sg fsm code are working in non-headless in
>> the way it prevents user issue a new admin op while the previous admin
>> op has been in progress, because sg shares one fsm state.
Fixed it.
Thanks
-Nagu
> -Original Message-
> From: Nagendra Kumar
> Sent: 07 March 2016 21:10
> To: hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com
> Cc: minh.c...@dektech.com.au; opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: delete su and its child objects at
> stdby amfd
ack, code review only/Thanks HansN
On 03/09/2016 11:35 AM, Quyen Dao wrote:
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nway_fsm.cc | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>
> After the nway application AMF entities are created, active amfd calls
> avd_sg_nway_si_assign
> function to
ack, code review only/Thanks HansN
On 03/07/2016 06:31 AM, Gary Lee wrote:
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ckpt_dec.cc | 25 -
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ckpt_updt.cc | 6 +++---
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/su.cc| 8 ++--
> 3 files changed, 29
ack, code review only/Thanks HansN
On 02/02/2016 07:48 AM, Gary Lee wrote:
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nored_fsm.cc | 19 ++-
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>
> failed SU is not necessarily involved in the SG realignment
>
> diff --git
