Hi Hoang,
Thanks for the clarifications.
Please hold on publishing new version of patch, I am in process of
reviewing[PATCH 2 to 8] ,
so we may have some more comments , so we can have on single
consolidated patch V2.
-AVM
On 7/1/2016 9:27 AM, Vo Minh Hoang wrote:
> Dear Mahesh,
>
>
Hi Alex,
interesting, I was not aware of ticket #1431!
I considered PLM but assumed it involves some more work than the patch I sent
out, as this feature is to be delivered in August.
The remote fencing patch could be replaced with your PLM solution when it is
ready and PLM seems to be the
Yes, it uses libvirt for all the EE admin operations performed on the
virtualized EE. There is no special fencing code in the PLM
implementation, even for the current non-virtualized implementation.
It's free with the PLM-EE hook in opensaf_reboot.
So, if there are cases where opensaf_reboot
Ok, I see. Will PLM use libvirt for something else than fencing in such
a configuration?
regards,
Anders Widell
On 06/30/2016 05:02 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
> Hi Anders,
>
> I have a basic working implementation which uses libvirt, but it's
> not yet ready to send out for others to test. It
Hi Anders,
I have a basic working implementation which uses libvirt, but it's
not yet ready to send out for others to test. It relies on libvirt to
talk to the hypervisor to tell it to fence the node. It uses the current
setup in opensaf_reboot which calls PLM. Mathi and I have been
Interesting!
How do you intend to implement this? Will OpenSAF rely on OpenHPI for
remote fencing also when running inside virtual machines? Does OpenHPI
support that today?
regards,
Anders Widell
On 06/30/2016 04:11 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> For what it is worth, there is a
Hi Hans,
For what it is worth, there is a ticket (1431) which will implement
virtualization of EEs in PLM, which is not currently supported. I am
planning on implementing this at some point this summer. That should
take care of fencing in a virtualized environment, without this patch,
but
Hi Hung,
Reviewed the patch.
Ack.
/Neel.
On 2016/06/28 09:19 AM, Hung Nguyen wrote:
> Summary: imm: Fix the startup delay in IMMD [#1896]
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 1896
> Peer Reviewer(s): Zoran, Neel
> Pull request to:
> Affected branch(es): 5.0, 5.1
> Development branch: 5.1
>
>
Okay, Thanks.
I wil get back, Iam going through the documentation of the cluster-glue
Iam wondering if a resource agent based approach might be more generic or
extendable!?
- Mathi.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans Nordebäck [mailto:hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June
osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/smfd_campaign_oi.cc | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
smfd will crash when smfNodeBundleActCmd is set to NULL, because of strdup.
diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/smfd_campaign_oi.cc
Summary:smfd:check smfNodeBundleActCmd at the time of modification [#1903]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 1903
Peer Reviewer(s): Lennart, Rafael
Affected branch(es): 4.7.x, 5.0.x, default
Development branch: default
Impacted area Impact y/n
Hi Anders, please see my comments inlined. /Thanks HansN
On 06/30/2016 10:31 AM, Anders Widell wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Some initial thoughts on this:
>
> * In this patch the STONITH stuff is enabled by default, and the
> PROMOTE_ACTIVE_TIMER is also enabled by default. I think we should
> keep the
Hi Mathi,
I run tests using xubuntu 14.04 with KVM and mainly used the man page
for stonith.
To install stonith on each virtual machine:
sudo apt-get install cluster-glue
I tested using both ssh and tcp. Tcp is easier to deploy, if a firewall
is used add tcp port 16509 to the firewall rule
Hi!
This patch is actually identical to the prototype code that I wrote and
attached to the ticket, so I am not sure if I am supposed to also review
it... anyways it is ack from from me for the first patch. :-)
regards,
Anders Widell
On 06/23/2016 07:31 AM, Hans Nordeback wrote:
>
Hi!
Some initial thoughts on this:
* In this patch the STONITH stuff is enabled by default, and the
PROMOTE_ACTIVE_TIMER is also enabled by default. I think we should keep
the default behaviour and not enable any of this by default.
* It feels a bit odd that the opensaf_reboot script reads
Hi Hans,
Could you please give a pointer to the webpage of the stonith agents (and/or
daemons?) that you used to test these changes?
Thanks,
Mathi.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hans Nordebäck [mailto:hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 1:08 PM
> To: Hans
Hi, anyone that had time to look at this patch? It would be good the get some
early feedback as it may have to some further changes
I considered if e.g. PLM should be used for the configuration but it seems to
be more work, what do you say?
/Thanks HansN
-Original Message-
From: Hans
17 matches
Mail list logo
