Hi Minh,
the "sticky" bit here is in fact the "restricted deletion bit", it is
used on directories,
e.g. the /tmp directory where several users have r/w access but when the
't' bit is
set only the file owners may delete its files. It should not be set on
files only directories
and I don't t
---
src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfNotificationReadFinalize.cc | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfNotificationReadFinalize.cc
b/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfNotificationReadFinalize.cc
index 531afd2..d0260aa 100644
--- a/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfNotification
---
src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfInitialize.cc | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfInitialize.cc
b/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfInitialize.cc
index 8538193..c1442dc 100644
--- a/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfInitialize.cc
+++ b/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfInitiali
---
src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfDispatch.cc | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfDispatch.cc
b/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfDispatch.cc
index 5fea4ef..81a722c 100644
--- a/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfDispatch.cc
+++ b/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfDispatch.cc
---
src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfSelectionObjectGet.cc | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfSelectionObjectGet.cc
b/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfSelectionObjectGet.cc
index 6da2c78..c4ca1c8 100644
--- a/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfSelectionObjectGet.cc
++
---
src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfFinalize.cc | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfFinalize.cc
b/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfFinalize.cc
index 84cd846..adf2167 100644
--- a/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfFinalize.cc
+++ b/src/ntf/apitest/tet_saNtfFinalize.cc
@@ -1
Summary: ntf: add new test case of API saNtfInitialize() of apitest [#2958]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2958
Peer Reviewer(s):minh
Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2958
Base revision: f8a6848a1cdbff0b518c3db951
Hi Mohan,
ack, review only/Thanks HansN
On 11/6/18 11:19, Mohan Kanakam wrote:
> Summary: clm: add new test case of API saClmClusterNotificationFree_4() of
> apitest [#2914]
> Review request for Ticket(s): 2914-1
> Peer Reviewer(s):Anders, Hans, Ravi
> Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH P
Hi HansN,
Can you please push this patch.
Thanks Mohan
High Availability Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
www.hasolutions.in
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Review Request
for clm: add new test cases in clm apitest [#2914]
From: "Hans Nordebäck"
Date: 11/9/18 6:43 pm
To: