Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for cpd: to correct failover behavior of cpsv [#1765] V3

2017-01-18 Thread A V Mahesh
Ok I will wait for new V4 patch . -AVM On 1/19/2017 1:05 PM, Vo Minh Hoang wrote: > Dear Mahesh, > > I checked with newest source code, problem still occur. > So it is in different case. > > Btw, I found some unexpected characters in submitted patch. > So I will send updated file for review. >

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for cpd: to correct failover behavior of cpsv [#1765] V3

2017-01-18 Thread Vo Minh Hoang
Dear Mahesh, I checked with newest source code, problem still occur. So it is in different case. Btw, I found some unexpected characters in submitted patch. So I will send updated file for review. Thank you and best regards, Hoang -Original Message- From: Vo Minh Hoang

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for cpd: to correct failover behavior of cpsv [#1765] V3

2017-01-18 Thread Vo Minh Hoang
Dear Mahesh, I will check that again. I have just rebased it when this patch stayed in local PC for too long. Thank you and best regards, Hoang -Original Message- From: A V Mahesh [mailto:mahesh.va...@oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 2:11 PM To: Hoang Vo

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for cpd: to correct failover behavior of cpsv [#1765] V3

2017-01-18 Thread A V Mahesh
Hi Hoang, >>Testing Commands: >>- >>Create checkpoint and set retention to big value Failover by >>killing osafamfd multiple times Check checkpoint information Is this killing osafamfd is just create fail-over ? ( make standby cpd to become active cpd) if so this has some

[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for cpd: to correct failover behavior of cpsv [#1765] V3

2017-01-18 Thread Hoang Vo
Summary: cpd: to correct failover behavior of cpsv [#1765] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 1765 Peer Reviewer(s): mahesh.va...@oracle.com; zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com Pull request to: mahesh.va...@oracle.com Affected branch(es): default Development branch: default