Summary: imm: fix memory leak in IMM library when search handle is closed [#907]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 907
Peer Reviewer(s): Neelakanta
Pull request to: Zoran
Affected branch(es): opensaf-4.4.x, default(4.5)
Development branch: default(4.5)
--------------------------------
Impacted area Impact y/n
--------------------------------
Docs n
Build system n
RPM/packaging n
Configuration files n
Startup scripts n
SAF services y
OpenSAF services n
Core libraries n
Samples n
Tests n
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
changeset 174e38438e18982b0433476fdac513a83fa5a8d0
Author: Zoran Milinkovic <zoran.milinko...@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 10:20:48 +0200
imm: fix memory leak in IMM library when search handle is closed [#907]
The patch provides the fix for fixing memory leak when search handles
are
closed before saImmOmSearchNext function reach the last object in the
search
result.
Complete diffstat:
------------------
osaf/libs/agents/saf/imma/imma_db.c | 5 ++++-
osaf/libs/agents/saf/imma/imma_om_api.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Testing Commands:
-----------------
Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Initialize a search with more objects in the result. Call saImmOmSearchNext
function once or more times, and saImmOmSearchNext should not reach the end of
the search result. Then close the search handle either by saImmOmSearchFinalize
or by saImmOmfinalize. Check that there is no more a memory leak in the library.
The check can be done by valgrind.
Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from Neelakanta
Arch Built Started Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips n n
mips64 n n
x86 n n
x86_64 n n
powerpc n n
powerpc64 n n
Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.
___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.
___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.
___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.
___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.
___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
