;>> variable(?) or IMM attribute - that would
>>>> control this standalone configuration changes to succeed.
>>>>
>>>> We could think of adding restrictions to cluster-size later on
>>>> perhaps.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>&
size later on perhaps.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Mathi.
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Anders Widell [mailto:anders.wid...@ericsson.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 7:28 PM
>>>> To: M
second/alternate to take over, etc!
>>>> I think this has to be thought through and not just considered as a
>>>> matter of 'allowing a configuration change' for a tool to work.
>>>> It is another thing that we should discussed this when the asymmetry in
-
From: praveen malviya
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 3:52 PM
To: Anders Widell; gary@dektech.com.au;
hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; Nagendra Kumar
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amf: Support AMF configurations
containing more than two OpenSAF 2N SUs [#79]
Please
To: Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu; Praveen Malviya;
>gary@dektech.com.au; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; Nagendra Kumar
>Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amf: Support AMF configurations
>containing more than two OpenSAF 2N SUs [#79]
>
>Now
Malviya;
>> gary....@dektech.com.au; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; Nagendra Kumar
>> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amf: Support AMF configurations
>> containing more than two OpenSAF 2N SUs [#79]
>>
>> Today it is p
u; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; Nagendra Kumar
>Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amf: Support AMF configurations
>containing more than two OpenSAF 2N SUs [#79]
>
>Today it is perfectly possible to configure a 1-node system without using any
>
y, April 01, 2016 3:52 PM
>> To: Anders Widell; gary....@dektech.com.au;
>> hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com; Nagendra Kumar
>> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amf: Support AMF configurations
>> containing more than two OpenSAF
;Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amf: Support AMF configurations
>containing more than two OpenSAF 2N SUs [#79]
>
>Please see my comments inline below:
>
>On 31-Mar-16 6:50 PM, Anders Widell wrote:
>> Yes I added the check in the admin
Please see my comments inline below:
On 31-Mar-16 6:50 PM, Anders Widell wrote:
> Yes I added the check in the admin op as you suggested. But I don't
> fully agree that the same check should be done when removing system
> controller nodes. With the introduction of this feature, we are starting
> t
Yes I added the check in the admin op as you suggested. But I don't
fully agree that the same check should be done when removing system
controller nodes. With the introduction of this feature, we are starting
to move away from the concept of different node types (controller /
payload). Indeed,
Hi,
In the diff patch, I have seen that admin operation on MW 2N SU is not
allowed when more than 2 SUs are configured which translates to the fact
that system is running with spare controllers.
A similar type of check is needed for deletion of controller
configuration from AMF. The check woul
Here is a patch that addresses the review comments from Hans and
Praveen. It should be applied on top of the AMF patch that was sent out
for review.
thanks,
Anders Widell
On 03/30/2016 04:35 PM, Anders Widell wrote:
Hi!
See my replies inline, marked [AndersW].
regards,
Anders Widell
On 03/
Hi!
See my replies inline, marked [AndersW].
regards,
Anders Widell
On 03/17/2016 11:32 AM, praveen malviya wrote:
> Hi Anders,
>
> Please find some comments and queries inline with [Praveen]
>
> Thanks,
> Praveen
>
>
> On 29-Feb-16 8:44 PM, Anders Widell wrote:
>> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/clm
Hi Anders,
Please find some comments and queries inline with [Praveen]
Thanks,
Praveen
On 29-Feb-16 8:44 PM, Anders Widell wrote:
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/clm.cc | 21 +-
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/amfd.h | 2 +
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/cb.h | 1
ack, code review. MInor comments inlined/Thanks HansN
On 02/29/2016 04:14 PM, Anders Widell wrote:
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/clm.cc | 21 +-
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/amfd.h | 2 +
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/cb.h | 1 +
> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/i
Hi Anders,
When applied over cloud resilience patches (#1620) failures observed for
amf patch:
Hunk #6 succeeded at 673 (offset 20 lines).
1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/main.cc.rej
..
1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
osaf/ser
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/clm.cc | 21 +-
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/amfd.h | 2 +
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/cb.h | 1 +
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/role.h | 2 +
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/main.cc| 78 ++-
osaf/service
18 matches
Mail list logo
