:58
To: Hans Feldt; Hans Nordebäck
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: fix SU constructor [#713]
Can you please share the advantage for using 'explicit' here:
+ explicit AVD_SU(const SaNameT *dn);
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From
ack, two minor comments:
1. specify the initializers in declaration order, (thats how they get
called).
2. if, as also IngvarB pointed out, SaNameT contained a default
constructor initializing its length to 0, it don't need to be initialized in
the class. I have already sent out a patch for
-Original Message-
From: Hans Nordebäck [mailto:hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com]
Sent: 28 May 2014 16:39
To: Nagendra Kumar; Hans Feldt
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: fix SU constructor [#713]
Hi Nagu, I think it is good practice to use
