Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: reject si-swap if SI will remain with only active state (NWAY)[#1516]

2015-10-29 Thread Hans Nordebäck
Hi Praveen, I agreee, ack from me, code review only/Thanks HansN On 10/29/2015 05:17 AM, praveen malviya wrote: > > > On 29-Oct-15 4:22 AM, Hans Nordebäck wrote: >> Hi Praveen, >> >> trying to understand the problem below, if N-way and >> saAmfSGMaxStandbySIsperSU = 1, >> and say there are 2 SUs

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: reject si-swap if SI will remain with only active state (NWAY)[#1516]

2015-10-28 Thread praveen malviya
On 29-Oct-15 4:22 AM, Hans Nordebäck wrote: > Hi Praveen, > > trying to understand the problem below, if N-way and > saAmfSGMaxStandbySIsperSU = 1, > and say there are 2 SUs and 2 SIs with the following assignments: > SU1 SU2 > Active Standby Standby Active > ^

Re: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: reject si-swap if SI will remain with only active state (NWAY)[#1516]

2015-10-28 Thread Hans Nordebäck
Hi Praveen, trying to understand the problem below, if N-way and saAmfSGMaxStandbySIsperSU = 1, and say there are 2 SUs and 2 SIs with the following assignments: SU1 SU2 Active Standby Standby Active ^^ ^ ^ | |

[devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: reject si-swap if SI will remain with only active state (NWAY)[#1516]

2015-10-13 Thread praveen . malviya
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nway_fsm.cc | 13 + 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) In the given configuration, swapped SI2 was fully assigned in the beginning but it had only one standby assignment. When SI-SWAP operation was performed on the SI, it caused removal