00-README.conf | 2 +-
Makefile.common | 4 ++--
README | 16
configure.ac | 18 ++
tools/cluster_sim_uml/README | 2 +-
5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
By default, build w
] [PATCH 1 of 1] build: Add extra GCC hardening compilation
flags [#650]
00-README.conf | 2 +-
Makefile.common | 4 ++--
README | 16
configure.ac | 18 ++
tools/cluster_sim_uml/README | 2 +-
5
..@ericsson.com]
> Sent: den 9 december 2013 12:45
> To: mathi.naic...@oracle.com
> Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] build: Add extra GCC hardening compilation
> flags [#650]
>
> 00-README.conf | 2 +-
> Makefile.co
Ack.
I was going through this link to review this patch.
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Flag-Variables-Ordering.html
It might be of interest to you too.
Basically, I wanted to figure out whether CPP_FLAGS should be passed to AM_CPP
FLAGS or
to AM_CXX FLAGS.
- Mathi.
>
It was an interesting page; I haven't read it before. Btw the name
CPPFLAGS could be confusing at first: "CPP" stands for C PreProcessor,
not "C Plus Plus". So it applies to both C and C++ code.
regards,
Anders Widell
2013-12-13 11:34, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu skrev:
> Ack.
> I was going t
The page is explaining more about the "order" of these flags.
My interest in this page was more to do with the order in which
these flags would get 'applied' on to the AM_**flags (and not in the context of
C or C++!!)
Basically wanted to be sure of any further chance of 'overwriding' of these
fla
