No, I haven't pushed it yet. It required re-basing and I sent out the
rebased version.
regards,
Anders Widell
On 04/04/2016 05:23 PM, A V Mahesh wrote:
> Have you pushed cpsv ?
> If yes ,how this patch is still getting applied on today's staging ?
>
> -AVM
>
> On 4/4/2016 8:25 PM, Anders Widell
Have you pushed cpsv ?
If yes ,how this patch is still getting applied on today's staging ?
-AVM
On 4/4/2016 8:25 PM, Anders Widell wrote:
> I noticed that I replied on the wrong mail; this patch is obviously
> for ticket [#79] and not [#1613].
>
> Regarding both ticket [#79] and [#1613], I
Ok I will check.
-AVM
On 4/4/2016 8:15 PM, Anders Widell wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here is a re-based version of this patch that can be pushed on the
> default branch after [#1621] was pushed. It also contain improved
> handling of a couple of error codes (in particular: TIMEOUT) from
>
Hi!
Here is a re-based version of this patch that can be pushed on the
default branch after [#1621] was pushed. It also contain improved
handling of a couple of error codes (in particular: TIMEOUT) from
saClmInitialize(), to work better together with ticket [#1621]. Could
you please take a
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/cpd_cb.h | 1 -
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_db.c| 15 ++-
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpnd/cpnd_db.c | 15 ++-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
Use the new support function GetSlotSubslotIdFromNodeId() to extract a
