Hi Canh,
Ack from me
Thanks,
Minh
On 28/09/16 13:35, Canh Van Truong wrote:
> osaf/libs/agents/saf/ntfa/ntfa_api.c | 2 +
> osaf/libs/agents/saf/ntfa/ntfa_util.c| 68
> +++
> tests/ntfsv/tet_saNtfNotificationSubscribe.c | 32 +
> 3 fi
Ack from me.
Please update the note in saNtfFinalize() header.
Thanks,
Praveen
On 06-Oct-16 9:12 AM, Canh Truong wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
>
> What I understand about deadlock as below:
>
> When other API and saNtfFinalize() called in parallel, both take the
> ntfhandle by ncshm_take_hdl(), the cell
Hi Praveen,
What I understand about deadlock as below:
When other API and saNtfFinalize() called in parallel, both take the
ntfhandle by ncshm_take_hdl(), the cell->use_ct increase
(and > 1). The saNtfFinalize() call ncshm_destroy_hdl() to destroy
ntfhandle, but ncshm_destroy_hdl() will check ce
Hi Canh,
Please find one comment inline with [Praveen].
Thanks,
Praveen
On 28-Sep-16 9:05 AM, Canh Van Truong wrote:
> osaf/libs/agents/saf/ntfa/ntfa_api.c | 2 +
> osaf/libs/agents/saf/ntfa/ntfa_util.c| 68
> +++
> tests/ntfsv/tet_saNtfNotificationSu
osaf/libs/agents/saf/ntfa/ntfa_api.c | 2 +
osaf/libs/agents/saf/ntfa/ntfa_util.c| 68 +++
tests/ntfsv/tet_saNtfNotificationSubscribe.c | 32 +
3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
In finalize(), ntfa deletes client and does n
