[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #768 Issues in invalid return values for AMF API's in negative scenario

2014-02-05 Thread manu
- Description has changed: Diff: --- old +++ new @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Migrated from http://fgahydjira.idc.oracle.com:8080/browse/OSAFSIXONE-830 + 1 .call saAmfComponentErrorReport_4 with negative error detection time Got return value : SA_AIS_OK, expected return value : INVALID_PARAM ~

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #768 Issues in invalid return values for AMF API's in negative scenario

2014-02-05 Thread manu
--- ** [tickets:#768] Issues in invalid return values for AMF API's in negative scenario** **Status:** unassigned **Created:** Thu Feb 06, 2014 06:03 AM UTC by manu **Last Updated:** Thu Feb 06, 2014 06:03 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody Migrated from http://fgahydjira.idc.oracle.com:8080/browse/OS

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #765 osafamfnd[27704]: comp.cc:1694: avnd_comp_csi_remove_done: Assertion 'm_AVND_SU_IS_PREINSTANTIABLE(comp->su)' failed

2014-02-05 Thread Nagendra Kumar
- **status**: accepted --> review - **Milestone**: future --> 4.4.RC1 --- ** [tickets:#765] osafamfnd[27704]: comp.cc:1694: avnd_comp_csi_remove_done: Assertion 'm_AVND_SU_IS_PREINSTANTIABLE(comp->su)' failed** **Status:** review **Created:** Fri Jan 31, 2014 02:41 PM UTC by Hans Feldt **Last

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #714 LGS: logd is asserting, when a switchover is initiated

2014-02-05 Thread elunlen
- **status**: assigned --> accepted - **assigned_to**: Mathi Naickan --> elunlen --- ** [tickets:#714] LGS: logd is asserting, when a switchover is initiated** **Status:** accepted **Created:** Fri Jan 10, 2014 09:26 AM UTC by Neelakanta Reddy **Last Updated:** Fri Jan 24, 2014 03:54 PM UTC **

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #713 AMF refactoring for 4.5

2014-02-05 Thread Anders Widell
Yes, absolutely. The exceptions thrown by the error checking code in the C++ standard library should terminate the process (which they do unless you catch them). They benefit is that we catch the error immediately when it happens, instead of getting a memory corruption that is much more difficul

Re: [tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #713 AMF refactoring for 4.5

2014-02-05 Thread Anders Björnerstedt
Agree with this. You mentioned c++ exceptions. Lets not start writing code for *catching* exceptions for now, since that can have quite heavy performance/stack-memory implications. That means thrown exceptions will be like asserts. /AndersBj From: Anders Widell

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] Re: #713 AMF refactoring for 4.5

2014-02-05 Thread Anders Bjornerstedt
Agree with this. You mentioned c++ exceptions. Lets not start writing code for *catching* exceptions for now, since that can have quite heavy performance/stack-memory implications. That means thrown exceptions will be like asserts. /AndersBj From: Anders Widell

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #713 AMF refactoring for 4.5

2014-02-05 Thread Anders Widell
One big improvement in C++ is the possibility to use std::string instead of C character arrays. C++ strings are much less error-prone, e.g. you can almost eliminate the risk for "buffer overflow" type of errors in string handling (which is still a common cause of security vulnerabilities in many

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #597 AMF: support to add component in unlocked SU

2014-02-05 Thread Nagendra Kumar
I need to check and tweak the code and it may take some time. Is other stakeholders agreeing to Math's suggestion and it solves their problem ? --- ** [tickets:#597] AMF: support to add component in unlocked SU** **Status:** fixed **Created:** Thu Oct 17, 2013 07:56 AM UTC by Hans Feldt **Last

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #738 Handling of negative timeout values in API

2014-02-05 Thread Mathi Naickan
- **Milestone**: 4.4.RC1 --> 4.5.FC --- ** [tickets:#738] Handling of negative timeout values in API** **Status:** assigned **Created:** Wed Jan 22, 2014 08:35 AM UTC by Sirisha Alla **Last Updated:** Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:22 AM UTC **Owner:** Mathi Naickan The issue is seen on changeset 4733 |

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #597 AMF: support to add component in unlocked SU

2014-02-05 Thread Mathi Naickan
I don't (yet) understand the backward compatibility issue. However, if existing deployments need the benefit of flexibility in the way the campaign can be written during the migration paths from older to newer releases, then we could just consider restrict the enhancement introduced in 597 as ap

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #711 log record write FAILED with SA_AIS_ERR_TRY_AGAIN after failover

2014-02-05 Thread elunlen
- **status**: review --> fixed --- ** [tickets:#711] log record write FAILED with SA_AIS_ERR_TRY_AGAIN after failover** **Status:** fixed **Created:** Wed Jan 08, 2014 12:08 PM UTC by Sirisha Alla **Last Updated:** Mon Jan 27, 2014 04:06 PM UTC **Owner:** elunlen Performed failover and thro

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #711 log record write FAILED with SA_AIS_ERR_TRY_AGAIN after failover

2014-02-05 Thread elunlen
changeset: 4910:cd893c991895 tag: tip user:Lennart Lund date:Wed Feb 05 09:27:07 2014 +0100 summary: logsv: Fix updating of log root directory when check-pointing lgs config [#711] ver: cd893c9918950a139bf53d6d501ab063f94c302c changeset: 4907:d202a843c684 branch:

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #688 logsv: Fix backward compatibility for #152 enhancement in OpenSAF 4.4

2014-02-05 Thread elunlen
- **status**: review --> fixed --- ** [tickets:#688] logsv: Fix backward compatibility for #152 enhancement in OpenSAF 4.4** **Status:** fixed **Created:** Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:34 PM UTC by elunlen **Last Updated:** Mon Jan 27, 2014 04:06 PM UTC **Owner:** elunlen To run the OpenSAF 4.4 versi

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #688 logsv: Fix backward compatibility for #152 enhancement in OpenSAF 4.4

2014-02-05 Thread elunlen
changeset: 4909:b5f555c3 user:Lennart Lund date:Wed Feb 05 09:27:07 2014 +0100 summary: lgsv: Fixes after review [#688] rev: b5f555c35a1200d38c200f3e87fd0dbe844f changeset: 4908:c6e1139fcf9f parent: 4904:03270a25ca09 user:Lennart Lund date:We