[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2135 amf: Use cgroups Unpopulated Notification for passive monitoring

2016-10-21 Thread Anders Widell
--- ** [tickets:#2135] amf: Use cgroups Unpopulated Notification for passive monitoring** **Status:** unassigned **Milestone:** 5.2.FC **Created:** Fri Oct 21, 2016 02:12 PM UTC by Anders Widell **Last Updated:** Fri Oct 21, 2016 02:12 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody Instead of using a busy loop

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2119 smf: Long DN setting in IMM is not correctly detected

2016-10-21 Thread Neelakanta Reddy
- **status**: accepted --> review --- ** [tickets:#2119] smf: Long DN setting in IMM is not correctly detected** **Status:** review **Milestone:** 5.0.2 **Created:** Thu Oct 13, 2016 03:07 PM UTC by elunlen **Last Updated:** Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:03 AM UTC **Owner:** Neelakanta Reddy

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2119 smf: Long DN setting in IMM is not correctly detected

2016-10-21 Thread Neelakanta Reddy
- **status**: assigned --> accepted --- ** [tickets:#2119] smf: Long DN setting in IMM is not correctly detected** **Status:** accepted **Milestone:** 5.0.2 **Created:** Thu Oct 13, 2016 03:07 PM UTC by elunlen **Last Updated:** Fri Oct 14, 2016 02:37 PM UTC **Owner:** Neelakanta Reddy

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2112 amfd: multiple SUs incorrectly assigned to single node

2016-10-21 Thread Praveen
adjust.patch Attachments: - [adjust.patch](https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/_discuss/thread/76ef399e/abe0/attachment/adjust.patch) (10.0 kB; application/octet-stream) --- ** [tickets:#2112] amfd: multiple SUs incorrectly assigned to single node** **Status:** assigned

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2112 amfd: multiple SUs incorrectly assigned to single node

2016-10-21 Thread Praveen
Hi Minh, I have gone through the patch. SU mapping must be same before headless state and after headless state. I was trying a totally different approach but could not finish it (attach is a crude patch adjust.patch). I think we are only left with your other suggestion i.e approach (1) only.

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2131 imm: Crash due to improper error handling

2016-10-21 Thread Anders Widell
- **status**: review --> fixed - **Comment**: changeset: 8244:85d4a2c924b8 branch: opensaf-5.0.x parent: 8239:34b4a35930c5 user:Anders Widell date:Fri Oct 21 09:42:33 2016 +0200 summary: imm: Fix error handling path when imma_sync_with_immnd fails

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2132 mds: Remove use of mutex at TIPC receive

2016-10-21 Thread Hans Nordebäck
- Description has changed: Diff: --- old +++ new @@ -1 +1 @@ -As a first step in imporving the MDS recv of TIPC events by changing data socket and bsr socket to nonblocking and loop over recv til EWOULDBLOCK or EAGAIN. Also changing to handle each descriptor before entering the poll

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2132 mds: Remove use of mutex at TIPC receive

2016-10-21 Thread Hans Nordebäck
- **summary**: mds: Improve recv of TIPC events --> mds: Remove use of mutex at TIPC receive - Description has changed: Diff: --- old +++ new @@ -1 +1 @@ -As a first step in imporving the MDS recv of TIPC events by changing data socket and bsr socket to nonblocking and loop over recv til

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2134 AMF: Update RTA saAmfSISUHAState to IMM

2016-10-21 Thread Praveen
Hi Minh, Ticket #1354 is based on a user list complaint. This ticket is related to states and runtime objects. Other ticket #1306 is related to notification that AMFD seds but talks almost similar problem from notification perspective. I think we can do something like this: 1)For fresh

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2133 AMF: Rollback admin shutdown SI operation if node failover

2016-10-21 Thread Praveen
Hi Minh, Lock operation on SI is in deviation from spec for all redundancy model. Spec does not talk about giving quiesced callback for lock operation (section 10.4 page 404). There is a ticket for this already. I just checked the code, in SI lock case, for 2N model AMFD gives removal and