[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #1294 amf: BAD_OPERATION needs to be returned for si-swap when there is single controller

This is in my mind to work. Will push shortly. Thanks -Nagu --- ** [tickets:#1294] amf: BAD_OPERATION needs to be returned for si-swap when there is single controller** **Status:** assigned **Milestone:** 5.0.2 **Created:** Tue Mar 31, 2015 07:51 AM UTC by Sirisha Alla **Last Updated:** Mon D

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #1294 amf: BAD_OPERATION needs to be returned for si-swap when there is single controller

Hi Nagu, I see Hans ack'ed your patch some months ago with some improvements and you are rabsing the patch. Could you please share with us your plan that you are going to send your patch to review again or push the code? Thanks, Long Nguyen. --- ** [tickets:#1294] amf: BAD_OPERATION needs t

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2223 NTFD: Increment iterator out of range NotificationMap

- **status**: review --> fixed - **assigned_to**: Minh Hon Chau --> nobody - **Comment**: Pushed changeset changeset: 8449:bd8e75b82038 changeset: 8448:acb91f24115a changeset: 8447:c0ccb717d4e7 --- ** [tickets:#2223] NTFD: Increment iterator out of range NotificationMap** **Status:*

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] Re: #1902 AMF: Extend escalation support during headless

trace of test case 02 & 03 --- ** [tickets:#1902] AMF: Extend escalation support during headless** **Status:** assigned **Milestone:** 5.2.FC **Created:** Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:02 PM UTC by Minh Hon Chau **Last Updated:** Mon Dec 19, 2016 04:03 AM UTC **Owner:** Minh Hon Chau If a comp/su failo

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] Re: #1902 AMF: Extend escalation support during headless

trace of test case 01 --- ** [tickets:#1902] AMF: Extend escalation support during headless** **Status:** assigned **Milestone:** 5.2.FC **Created:** Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:02 PM UTC by Minh Hon Chau **Last Updated:** Mon Dec 19, 2016 04:03 AM UTC **Owner:** Minh Hon Chau If a comp/su failover o

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #1902 AMF: Extend escalation support during headless

The issue of unstablility of component failover test case has been reproduced Test case 01: 1- Set up 2N model, PL4 hosts SU4, PL5 hosts SU5, spare SU5B. Si deps safSi=AmfDemoTwon2 depends safSi=AmfDemoTwon1 depends safSi=AmfDemoTwon 2- Bring up 2N app, SU4 has active assignment, SU5 has standby

[tickets] [opensaf:tickets] #2230 pyosaf: imm om and oi utils bindings don't handle BAD HANDLE

--- ** [tickets:#2230] pyosaf: imm om and oi utils bindings don't handle BAD HANDLE ** **Status:** unassigned **Milestone:** 5.0.2 **Created:** Sun Dec 18, 2016 01:21 PM UTC by Johan Mårtensson **Last Updated:** Sun Dec 18, 2016 01:21 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody The utils functions for imm om