- **status**: unassigned --> review
---
** [tickets:#2286] base: unhandled SIGPIPE in osaf_auth_server_connect**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 5.0.2
**Created:** Thu Feb 02, 2017 02:54 AM UTC by Gary Lee
**Last Updated:** Thu Feb 02, 2017 02:56 AM UTC
**Owner:** Gary Lee
2017-01-25 07:02
Hi Minh,
I also wouldn't prefer to rollback but because of internal
implementation, I am just reusing the code. I am preferring return code as
TRY_AGAIN because the error has occurred and the operation can't be completed.
Thanks
-Nagu
From: Minh Hon Chau [mailto:minh-c..
Hi Praveen,
AMFD is not reading RTA during failover it seems. Could it be a loss of MBC
update seen in #2228?
If loss of RTA from headless is detected, we can recover the state and continue
if only one RTA is lost. The recovery of lost states is difficult (or
impossible ?) if having 2 or more
Hi Nagu,
I prefer to not rollback the operations (as commented by Praveen earlier) if
the rollback is due to internal implementation, not from a specific use case.
Anyway if we have no way to correct it, then we have to accept it. I don't have
a clear indication on which error code should be re
- **status**: unassigned --> assigned
- **assigned_to**: A V Mahesh (AVM)
---
** [tickets:#2278] mds: Blocking send causes AMF health check time-out**
**Status:** assigned
**Milestone:** 5.1.1
**Created:** Thu Jan 26, 2017 09:49 AM UTC by Anders Widell
**Last Updated:** Thu Jan 26, 2017 09:49
Hi Vu,
"Consistent" in AIS spec seems not clear, some can inteprete to count length
with null pointer, some may not. This issue had been flagged in review of
#2038. After this check is introduced, applications may still be running
without problem, some may receive INVALID_PARAM. I guess it's po
- **summary**: base: ignore SIGPIPE in osaf_auth_server_connect --> base:
unhandled SIGPIPE in osaf_auth_server_connect
---
** [tickets:#2286] base: unhandled SIGPIPE in osaf_auth_server_connect**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 5.0.2
**Created:** Thu Feb 02, 2017 02:54 AM UTC by Gary L
---
** [tickets:#2286] base: ignore SIGPIPE in osaf_auth_server_connect**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 5.0.2
**Created:** Thu Feb 02, 2017 02:54 AM UTC by Gary Lee
**Last Updated:** Thu Feb 02, 2017 02:54 AM UTC
**Owner:** Gary Lee
2017-01-25 07:02:53 SC-2 osafamfd[480]: NO Re-initi
Hi Minh,
I think, the applications encountered this case have to fix the wrong code from
their side as they have not followed the NTF AIS spec correctly.
Here is the statement from the AIS spec.
> additionalText optional – length must be consistent with lengthAdditionalText
Also, I remember the
---
** [tickets:#2285] LOG: Check size of logBufSize could be non backward
compatible**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 5.0.2
**Created:** Thu Feb 02, 2017 01:44 AM UTC by Minh Hon Chau
**Last Updated:** Thu Feb 02, 2017 01:44 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
NTF has received INVALID_PARAM wh
Hi,
I have similar problem with deleting large amount of objects in IMM.
CCB has only 1 object (the root object in cascade delete).
Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. populate IMM with large amount of objects. The easiest way is to use
immpopulate. I tested with 20 objects.
2. immcfg -d
Th
- **status**: review --> fixed
- **Comment**:
changeset: 8552:63084c85e928
tag: tip
parent: 8549:346005001e6f
user:Neelakanta Reddy
date:Wed Feb 01 16:25:33 2017 +0530
summary: smf: retry the ccb modify operation when the ccb is aborted with
resource abort [#22
Anders Widell do you mena "tipc" command is the below ?
===
xenial (8) tipc.8.gz
Provided by: iproute2_4.3.0-1ubuntu3_i386 bug
NAME
tipc - a TIPC configuration and management tool
SYNOPSIS
tipc [ OPTIONS ] COMMAND ARGUMEN
- **status**: review --> fixed
- **Comment**:
changeset: 8549:346005001e6f
tag: tip
user:Hans Nordeback
date:Wed Feb 01 10:39:08 2017 +0100
summary: base: make rpm giving error with gcc version 6.1.0 on SLES11
[#2282]
---
** [tickets:#2282] base: `make rpm` gi
The IMM service, says that the default number of supported objects is 1 for
one CCB., Beyond which there may be corruptuion.in IMM. if your environment
can support, then the limit of IMMSV_MAX_OBJECTS can be increased grater
than 1.
---
** [tickets:#2284] IMM: Improper return code
- **Type**: defect --> enhancement
- **Comment**:
Changing to enhancement as it changes return types of few admin operation
mentioned above.
---
** [tickets:#2133] AMF: Rollback admin shutdown/lock SI operation if node
failover**
**Status:** accepted
**Milestone:** 5.2.FC
**Created:** Thu O
- Description has changed:
Diff:
--- old
+++ new
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@
Syslog - immcfg: ER TOO MANY Object Names line:733
-Expected behavior - Proper error string should be returned
+Expected behavior - Proper return code with error string should be returned
- **Comment**:
>From
- **status**: assigned --> review
---
** [tickets:#2282] base: `make rpm` giving error with gcc version 6.1.0**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 5.2.FC
**Created:** Tue Jan 31, 2017 09:38 AM UTC by A V Mahesh (AVM)
**Last Updated:** Tue Jan 31, 2017 09:38 AM UTC
**Owner:** A V Mahesh (AVM)
18 matches
Mail list logo
