On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 11:16:26PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> Peter Stuge wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:28:14PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> >>the typedefs are not conditional or anything, so there is no
> >>difference if we uee "unsigned char" directly in that function
> >
>
Peter Stuge wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:28:14PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
the typedefs are not conditional or anything, so there is no
difference if we uee "unsigned char" directly in that function
Until it has to be changed in many places instead of one because
unsigned char isn
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:28:14PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> the typedefs are not conditional or anything, so there is no
> difference if we uee "unsigned char" directly in that function
Until it has to be changed in many places instead of one because
unsigned char isn't 8 bit anymore. M
