Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I guess we will sooner or later need card specific get_response
commands. but that also means an architecture change: currently the
loop is done in the generic apdu.c code, and I guess it would need
to move into the card specific get_response code.
Thi
Here's some really minimal docs on the APDUs that PIV cards use.
There's also 2 example apdu sequences:
1) Read certificate
2) Sign piece of data
--
Thomas Harning Jr.
Authentication Engineer @ Identity Alliance
http://www.trustbearer.com/
For PIN commands: replace p2's 80 with 81 for PUK/SO_PIN
Hi Thomas,
I guess we will sooner or later need card specific get_response
commands. but that also means an architecture change: currently the
loop is done in the generic apdu.c code, and I guess it would need
to move into the card specific get_response code.
This change breaks PIV chaining.
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 10:50 +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> at least with cryptoflex only the sign apdu returns 0x61 and the number
> of bytes we can fetch. all get response commands return 90 00. so we
> need to keep the number of bytes to get from the first command, and then
> loop till we r
On 03/01/07, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess that change was unintended. does anyone know the encoding magic
of svn in detail, so maybe it can prefent this from happening? we want
to tell svn "this is utf-8" and if people have a different locale,
it should convert it when c
Thomas Harning Jr. a écrit :
> On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 20:22 +0100, JP Szikora wrote:
>
>> Thomas Harning Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone compiled SCA on a MacIntel?
>>> I know that the recent builds of SCA are Universals, but I need a
>>> version w/ the new PIV support patch applied ( ticket #1
