Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:59:30PM -0500, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>>> Would you be willing to post a .pdf with the slides somewhere?
>> Gave the same talk at NIST q few weeks ago, before 0.11.2 was
>> released:
>>
>> http://middleware.internet2.edu/pki07/proceedings/slides/1
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:59:30PM -0500, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
> > Would you be willing to post a .pdf with the slides somewhere?
>
> Gave the same talk at NIST q few weeks ago, before 0.11.2 was
> released:
>
> http://middleware.internet2.edu/pki07/proceedings/slides/10-engert-piv-linux.ppt
Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:33:03PM -0500, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>> I can now update my PowerPoint sides for a talk in 4 hours
>> at the AFS & Kerberos Best Practices Workshop.
>
> Would you be willing to post a .pdf with the slides somewhere?
Gave the same talk at NIST
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 12:33:03PM -0500, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
> I can now update my PowerPoint sides for a talk in 4 hours
> at the AFS & Kerberos Best Practices Workshop.
Would you be willing to post a .pdf with the slides somewhere?
//Peter
___
Hi Douglas,
thanks for testing. I was optimistic enough to upload it, but couldn't even
test it myself. Good to hear it is working for you.
Will update the web page later and send an announcement (maybe tomorrow
after getting some testing done).
btw: I removed the CSP, as it didn't work anyway
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 May 2007 17:07:37 Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>> I see you built the SCA with 0.11.2, are you going to build the SCA
>> with 0.11.2 soon?
>
> as soon as I find time. I hope tomorrow (but I had the same hope for days...).
>
> Andreas
>
Looks like you f
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
If all application such as OpenSSL, GnuTLS, OpenVPN, OpenSSH, GnuPG,
KDE, Gnome, Mozilla etc... would have supported one interface, hence
PKCS#11, user will benafit from a secure environenment.
Now days, a user should run about 5 separate agents on its machine in
order to wor
On 5/10/07, Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This depends on the definition of standard.
>
> Secure shell is also a standard. The SSH agent protocol too.
SSH is, SSH Agent protocol is specific to implementation.
> But what really matters is that the SSH agent protocol is already
> impleme
