Re: [opensc-devel] [WINDOWS] Update putty patch

2008-03-18 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 3/18/08, Timothy J Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Huh? RedHat's libcoolkeypk11 and MUSCLE's libmusclepk11 are both > GPL'd or GPL compatible PKCS#11 modules. And NSS is Mozilla licensed, > which implements the calling end. They all use RSA Security Labs headers without following the li

Re: [opensc-devel] [WINDOWS] Update putty patch

2008-03-18 Thread Timothy J Miller
On Mar 18, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: no. but puttysc claims to be GPL'ed, which is quite stupid - I don't know of any GPL compatible pkcs#11 implementation. (opensc is not - we use openssl... and pkcs#11 header files (the original) are GPL incompatible too.) Huh? RedHat

Re: [opensc-devel] [WINDOWS] Update putty patch

2008-03-18 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But if you want other people to respect your copyright and licenses on your > code, you should start respecting other peoples copyright and licenses first. > and using PKCS#11 without proper attribution is a breac

Re: [opensc-devel] [WINDOWS] Update putty patch

2008-03-18 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Dienstag, 18. März 2008 19:52:02 schrieb Timothy J Miller: > On Mar 18, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > no. but puttysc claims to be GPL'ed, which is quite stupid - I don't > > know of > > any GPL compatible pkcs#11 implementation. (opensc is not - we use > > openssl... > > and

Re: [opensc-devel] [TEST REQUEST] libp11, engine_pkcs11, openct - New build systems

2008-03-18 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Strange! Which version of autoconf/automake/libtool do you use? I use: sys-devel/autoconf-2.61 sys-devel/automake-1.10 sys-devel/libtool-1.5.26 And: $ autoreconf -i -v -f On 3/18/08, Jan Just Keijser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Alon, > > I've downloaded [1], [2] and [3]; I tried to run > a

Re: [opensc-devel] [WINDOWS] Update putty patch

2008-03-18 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > no. but puttysc claims to be GPL'ed, which is quite stupid - I don't know of > any GPL compatible pkcs#11 implementation. (opensc is not - we use openssl... > and pkcs#11 header files (the original) are GPL incompa

Re: [opensc-devel] [TEST REQUEST] libp11, engine_pkcs11, openct - New build systems

2008-03-18 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Thanks Fixed. On 3/18/08, Jan Just Keijser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ah OK, the > autoreconf -i -v -f > did the trick. All of them now build on cygwin, next stop is Mingw. One > minor thing: running configure in the 'openct' directory results in the > message: > configure.ac:engine_pkcs1

Re: [opensc-devel] [WINDOWS] Update putty patch

2008-03-18 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Samstag, 15. März 2008 21:07:31 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev: > Hello Windows developers, > > I've updated the putty patch [1] to work with latest gcc and free pkcs11.h > file. Current patch is for putty-0.58 while there is putty-0.60 release. > > Does anyone wish to rebase patch to 0.60? > > Does anyon