Re: [opensc-devel] Some small PAM prompt changes to pam_pkcs11 module

2008-10-09 Thread Robert Relyea
Huie-Ying Lee wrote: Hello, I have completed the prompt configuration enhancement, as suggested by Ludovic. In this enhancement, I added a new field, token_type, in the pam_pkcs11.conf file. The value of the "token_type" will be used in the user prompt messages and its default value i

Re: [opensc-devel] Some small PAM prompt changes to pam_pkcs11 module

2008-10-09 Thread Huie-Ying Lee
Hello, I have completed the prompt configuration enhancement, as suggested by Ludovic. In this enhancement, I added a new field, token_type, in the pam_pkcs11.conf file. The value of the "token_type" will be used in the user prompt messages and its default value is "Smart card". The

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3579] remove html.out and man.out before filling them to avoid problems

2008-10-09 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How can they be exist if rule executes? I don't understand your question. The directories html.out and man.out are created by the mv command at the end of the rules. if man.out already exist (from a previous make) then the

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3579] remove html.out and man.out before filling them to avoid problems

2008-10-09 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
If you enter a rule: xxx/*: Then xxx/* does not exist, right? On 10/9/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How can they be exist if rule executes? > > > I don't understand your question. > > The directories

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3580] make the * targets depend on only one dependency to avoid problems on

2008-10-09 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
I could not reproduce this. If I do b/* it will be executed once for b. Anyway, if you are sure the modification works, it is great. I just don't understand why it defer. Thanks, Alon. On 10/9/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL P

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3580] make the * targets depend on only one dependency to avoid problems on

2008-10-09 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was not aware of any problem, can you please provide some sample? > I worked very hard to make it work with automake generation of rules. The problem, if I understand correctly, is that you have have something like (after

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3580] make the * targets depend on only one dependency to avoid problems on

2008-10-09 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
I was not aware of any problem, can you please provide some sample? I worked very hard to make it work with automake generation of rules. Alon. On 10/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Revision: 3580 > Author: ludovic.rousseau > Date: 2008-10-09 11:02:42 +0200 (Thu, 09 O

Re: [opensc-devel] [opensc-commits] svn opensc changed [3579] remove html.out and man.out before filling them to avoid problems

2008-10-09 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hi! How can they be exist if rule executes? Alon. On 10/9/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Revision: 3579 > Author: ludovic.rousseau > Date: 2008-10-09 10:35:32 +0200 (Thu, 09 Oct 2008) > > Log Message: > --- > remove html.out and man.out before filling them

Re: [opensc-devel] Problems using opensc-pkcs11.so as a cryptoadm provider with Solaris libpkcs11

2008-10-09 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Ludovic Rousseau wrote: On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ludovic Rousseau wrote: Hello, On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OpenSC will show a slot is present if there is a reader, but will segfault if C_

Re: [opensc-devel] Problems using opensc-pkcs11.so as a cryptoadm provider with Solaris libpkcs11

2008-10-09 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ludovic Rousseau wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> OpenSC will show a slot is present if there is a reader, but >>> will segfault if C_