On 12/12/08, Martin Paljak wrote:
> > I disagree. When the subject is complex and/or sensitive and/or
> > none-reversible the above does not apply. Token management is complex,
> > sensitive and sometimes none-reversible.
> >
> As long as it remains read-only it is safe I believe.
Just wrote an
On 12.12.2008, at 9:20, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> I'm a firm believer in the 'explorer' approach to command line
>> utilities.
>> This means that the tools should always work and do something
>> useful with
>> minimal options and allow to tweak and expand the functionality in a
>> consistent way
On 12/12/08, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I understand this... But having too many options is also makes it
> >> > difficult for people to use the tool.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I'm a firm believer in the 'explorer' approach to command line utilities.
> >> This means that the tools should
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 12/6/08, Martin Paljak wrote:
>> On 06.12.2008, at 21:27, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On 12/6/08, Martin Paljak wrote:
>> >
>> > > As it affect the overall operation of pkcs11-tool (C_GetSlotList is
>> called
>> > > only once during th
