Hello,
I've modified this as a user got ERROR_INVALID_FUNCTION and did not
know it is safe
to ignore it...
I don't think there is any reason to alarm users for optional feature
determination.
However, there are other cases that we do need PCSC_ERROR messages to user, so
converting all to debug ma
On 03.04.2009, at 22:17, webmas...@opensc-project.org wrote:
> 3. Do not print error if SCardControl fails.
> + sc_debug(reader->ctx, "SCardControl failed", rv);
This debug will show a really useless -2x error (after %s is
added in the right place?)
...
> -
Hello,
Will you maintain the hal support from now on?
Can you please provide a single patch against trunk? A single "svn
diff" will do.
Thanks!
2009/4/2 Stanislav Brabec :
> Attached patches port openct to the latest hal and provide capabilities
> for the forthcoming PolicyKit smart card support
Hello,
The issuers you get are the root certificates.
All other certificates are stored in the certs.
Two facts you should consider:
1. It is not safe to store root certificates on PKCS#11 token, as
anyone, even without
authentication can add certificates into the token.
2. Storing the complete c
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> 2009/4/2 Stanislav Brabec :
> > Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >> Why aren't they detected by the CCID class attribute?
> >
> > They are detected correctly as "CCID Compatible" even without this
> > patch.
> >
>
> So why do we need this?
If the list contains only CCID compliant devic
