Hi,
I can't use it:
$ patch -p0 ../pkcs11.diff
patching file src/pkcs11/framework-pkcs15.c
patch: malformed patch at line 10: struct pkcs15_prkey_object {
Please provide a new patch against trunk (which is not @ r18006) as an
attachment.
Thanks,
Martin
On 02.10.2009, at 16:29, Pierre
Am Freitag 02 Oktober 2009 17:40:22 schrieb Jim Rees:
I just returned to smart card work to find that Gemplus has killed my
favorite card, the Cryptoflex. So I bought some Aladdin PRO 32k cards (not
usb tokens). But I can't get them to init. Any suggestions?
...
[]DF 27285
On 30.09.2009, at 19:58, Pierre Ossman wrote:
So how is one supposed to write a PKCS#11 layer for a PKCS#15 card in
this scenario? Right now OpenSC relies on there being either a public
key object or a certificate on the card that corresponds to the
private
key, but that does not seem to
Hi,
shall we create a new opensc 0.11.* release? things to wait for
before we create such a release?
I think Aleksey had a patch noone commented on so far and still
needs to be reviewed and commited.
Regards, Andreas
___
opensc-devel mailing list
Le 02-oct.-09 à 14:42, Martin Paljak a écrit :
The reason for a custom OpenSSL was apparently DSO support, which is
built into OpenSSL 0.9.8 on Snow Leopard = we have the option of
dropping OpenSSL, IMHO.
Hi Martin,
You're right. I've recompiled engine and linked with the natively
Hello,
Martin, could you explain please what for we need this change?
http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/changeset/3752/branches/martin/0.12/src/libopensc/apdu.c
if SC_APDU_CASE_3_SHORT and apdu-datalen == 0 and
apdu-lc == 0 then no error? Why?
Thanks
On 03.10.2009, at 15:19, Aleksey Samsonov wrote:
Hello,
Martin, could you explain please what for we need this change?
http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/changeset/3752/branches/martin/0.12/src/libopensc/apdu.c
if SC_APDU_CASE_3_SHORT and apdu-datalen == 0 and
apdu-lc == 0 then no error?
Either way it deserves a clear and longer than one line comment in the
code, weather it allows 0 Lc or forbids it.
m.
On 03.10.2009, at 15:19, Aleksey Samsonov wrote:
Hello,
Martin, could you explain please what for we need this change?
