>> As for me, the 'p15card->pin_cache[]' system is more attractive.
>> Somebody have the reasons for the other or for the both ?
>
>There's another option: take the part that deals with PIN codes in >keycache.c
>and make it use libopensc PIN cache and leave the keycache.c in >pkcs15init?
>
>
>Th
Hi.
On 20.11.2009, at 11:18, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>>> For now I propose this small patch to permit "generate_key" with
>>> pkcs11-tool.
>>>
>>
>> More universal (but not full and not good for future) patch is here:
>> http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2009-November/012863.htm
>What for there are two PIN cache systems?
>Why do not use the unique one?
Probably historic reasons...
>
>As for me, the 'p15card->pin_cache[]' system is more attractive.
>Somebody have the reasons for the other or for the both ?
I agree, "p15card->pin_cache" seems more interesting.
François.
Aleksey Samsonov wrote:
> François Leblanc wrote:
>
>> For now I propose this small patch to permit "generate_key" with pkcs11-tool.
>>
>
> More universal (but not full and not good for future) patch is here:
> http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2009-November/012863.html
>
