Dear Kerstin,
today I have tried to reproduce to behaviour you described. But the
result is, that everything works fine when using opensc release 0.11.13.
I have CardOS 4.3b in use and the properties of my keys are as follows:
Private Key Object; RSA
Usage: decrypt, sign, unwrap
Public Ke
On 10 Jun 2010, at 13:00, Emanuele Pucciarelli wrote:
> What seems unlikely to me is mass storage encryption directly on the
> device: I would guess that you need expensive hardware (at least,
> expensive compared to ordinary smart cards) to perform decent
> encryption at reasonable bitrates for
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 14:20, Ludovic Rousseau
wrote:
> The advantage of using a HID interface instead of CCID is that, on
> Windows, any user application can talk to a HID device without
> installing a driver.
> With a CCID interface and an old Windows (before Vista I think) you
> have to insta
2010/6/10 Emanuele Pucciarelli :
> Hello Jean-Michel,
>
>> Do you have any information on the work involved to add some HID
>> protocol to OpenSC. Is HID protocol standard or would any solution be
>> proprietary?
>
> Just trying to add my 2 cents: I am aware of tokens that expose a USB
> hub with m
Hi,
I am working on the SSO- and Signature-Framework at the Ruhr Universität. We
recently tried to upgrade to version 0.11.13 but encountered some problems with
the apdus sent for digital signature operations. CardOS 4.3 cards provide two
commands for the same functionality, PSO_ CDS and PSO_DE
Hello Jean-Michel,
> Do you have any information on the work involved to add some HID
> protocol to OpenSC. Is HID protocol standard or would any solution be
> proprietary?
Just trying to add my 2 cents: I am aware of tokens that expose a USB
hub with more than one device connected to it. Specifi
Finally, here it is:
http://www.dnie.es/descargas/codigo_fuente.html
According to:
http://www.kriptopolis.org/disponibles-fuentes-pkcs11
Seems that code doesn't include component private key to establish secure
channel,
but I thing that it can be found in other software (java/windows) provided
Hi folks,
with changeset 4375 a new bug was introduced, which brakes applications
looking up certificates by serial number. For example Mozilla
Thunderbird. One consequence of this is, that at the moment it is
impossible to read encrypted emails with the named email client using
ope...@head.
Hi J-M,
Are you sure that this is correct?
Why would a vendor use HID when there is a generally supported
Mass Memory class?
HID is used by some USB stick vendors but for entirely different
purposes like generating OTPs.
Mass memory <> Human interface device.
Regards
Anders
Jean-Michel Pouré -
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:30 +0200, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> Are you sure that this is correct?
Of course, I am not sure, as I don't have the spec in front of me. Leave
me some time to enquire. Bye.
--
Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu
_
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 11:47 +0300, Martin Paljak wrote:
> Do you mean HID as http://www.hidglobal.com/ or HID as
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_interface_device ?
I mean Human interface device, the USB class.
--
Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu
On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:42 , Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> Per discussion with vendor, it seems that some token only support an HID
> protocol. From a technical point of view, it allows to use the token as
> an USB stick with 2GB to 8GB memory. This seems a nice idea, because
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 21:07 +0300, Martin Paljak wrote:
> Please note that this is for core OpenSC only, no additional software
> is bundled at the moment.
I will test it ASAP as well as 0.11.14 and report.
Kind regards,
--
Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu
_
Dear Friends,
Per discussion with vendor, it seems that some token only support an HID
protocol. From a technical point of view, it allows to use the token as
an USB stick with 2GB to 8GB memory. This seems a nice idea, because it
allows to format and encrypt the stick using the same device. When
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:13:18 +0800, Martin Paljak
wrote:
> This makes sense, with the exception that if it is possible to change
> PIN flags afterwards, it should be possible the set them via command
> line when creating the PIN as well. I'm a bit lost now how this relates
> to profile in
15 matches
Mail list logo
