2010/9/4 Michael StJohns :
> Hi -
Hello,
> It wasn't clear from your emails earlier, but are you also building in the
> appropriate SELinux contexts and permissions? On Fedora 13, I've run into
> some SE error messages related to the packaged PCSCd.
I have never played with SELinux. I will tr
2010/9/4 Peter Stuge :
> Martin Paljak wrote:
>> Nothing bad will happen if pcscd is not gracefully shut down when
>> the computer is rebooting,
>
> Not the problem. But if pcscd crashes it should be restarted, as long
> as the card is still inserted. So pcscd needs to be supervised. Many
> distrib
2010/9/4 Martin Paljak :
> Hello,
>
>
>> I decided to use a new group called "pcscd".
>> I wrote an blog article [3] about this feature.
>>
>> pcsc-lite 1.6.5 is not yet released to allow anybody to comment on the
>> idea and provide feedback before the release.
>> You can get a snapshot of pcsc-li
Martin Paljak wrote:
> >> >> Why not make the udev rule start pcscd,
..
> The same way patching the udev file is done by the package
> (creator), as needed.
Mh, maybe. But I don't think this is something packagers are really
used to being a task for them.. Or maybe I'm wrong?
> > System pcscd wo
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 21:29, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Martin Paljak wrote:
>> >> Why not make the udev rule start pcscd,
>> >
>> > One reason is that it needs highly distribution dependent udev rules,
>>
>> Existence of pcscd group is also distribution dependent, to some
>> extent (meaning, i
Martin Paljak wrote:
> >> Why not make the udev rule start pcscd,
> >
> > One reason is that it needs highly distribution dependent udev rules,
>
> Existence of pcscd group is also distribution dependent, to some
> extent (meaning, it has to exist and maybe needs to be created)
True. This is typ
On Sep 4, 2010, at 8:33 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Martin Paljak wrote:
>> Why not make the udev rule start pcscd, running as a system user
>> (nobody?), when a reader is connected?
>
> One reason is that it needs highly distribution dependent udev rules,
> while setting owner/permissions on a dev
Martin Paljak wrote:
> Why not make the udev rule start pcscd, running as a system user
> (nobody?), when a reader is connected?
One reason is that it needs highly distribution dependent udev rules,
while setting owner/permissions on a device is distribution agnostic.
//Peter
___
Hello,
> I decided to use a new group called "pcscd".
> I wrote an blog article [3] about this feature.
>
> pcsc-lite 1.6.5 is not yet released to allow anybody to comment on the
> idea and provide feedback before the release.
> You can get a snapshot of pcsc-lite and libccid from [4]. You have t
2010/8/30 Ludovic Rousseau :
> Hello,
>
> As listed on the pcsc-lite TODO file [1] I would like to run pcscd as
> a normal user instead of root. To do this I need to:
> 1. select a normal user id or group id to use
> 2. write a udev (or whatever hotplug mechanism is used) file to set
> the access r
10 matches
Mail list logo
