Hi Martin!
2010/9/13 Martin Paljak
> > Should I set card->max_recv_size and card->max_send_size
> > in tcos_init()?
> >
> No. Sorry, this place was erroneously left untouched and is fixed in SVN
> trunk. Please verify that it works as expected.
>
Not yet! I had to replace line 122 of iso7816.c
Available:
http://www.opensc-project.org/downloads/users/alonbl/temp/opensc-i686-w64-mingw32-010-setup.exe
http://www.opensc-project.org/downloads/users/alonbl/temp/opensc-x86_64-w64-mingw32-010-setup.exe
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> OK.
> I have the images, hope it is w
OK.
I have the images, hope it is working.
But using the svn to upload these takes forever, if someone has ssh
account somewhere I will send it to him much quickly.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
>
> On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
>> Is opensc-0.12 relea
On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
>> Based on Google, visitors to opensc-project.org consist of ~60%
>> Windows users, ~30% Linux users and ~10% Mac OS X users (57%, 27%,
>> 12%), which is not a scientific fact or result of a study, but still
>> shows something.
>
> D
On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Is opensc-0.12 released? Or should I use trunk?
You should use trunk.
--
Martin Paljak
@martinpaljak.net
+3725156495
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.ope
Is opensc-0.12 released? Or should I use trunk?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I try to compile now.
>
> 2010/9/13 Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE
>>
>> > Based on Google, visitors to opensc-project.org consist of ~60%
>> > Windows users, ~30% Linux users and ~10% Mac OS X user
I try to compile now.
2010/9/13 Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE
> > Based on Google, visitors to opensc-project.org consist of ~60%
> > Windows users, ~30% Linux users and ~10% Mac OS X users (57%, 27%,
> > 12%), which is not a scientific fact or result of a study, but still
> > shows something.
>
> D
> Based on Google, visitors to opensc-project.org consist of ~60%
> Windows users, ~30% Linux users and ~10% Mac OS X users (57%, 27%,
> 12%), which is not a scientific fact or result of a study, but still
> shows something.
Dear all,
A user is asking us for a Windows 7 64bit OpenSC 0.12 installe
Hello,
On Sep 13, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
>> I just did a quick "grep LOGIN_REQUIRED *.c" and it seems that only
>> the WestCOS and OpenPGP emulations set LOGIN_REQUIRED
>> while all other emulation-routines don't.
>
> CKF_LOGIN_REQUIRED from PKCS#11 (which is the flag missing in
Hello.
From your log I see that the user PIN is marked as unblocking PIN:
PIN [PIN]
Com. Flags: 0x3
ID: 01
Flags : [0x51], case-sensitive, initialized, unblockingPin
Length: min_len:6, max_len:16, stored_len:16
Pad char : 0x00
Refer
Hi,
now I detected another flaw in 0.12.0:
After some idle time the browser seems to forget completely about the chip card.
If you request an encrypted web page, a ssl handshake error is displayed.
For production purposes I'm now returning to opensc2 0.11.4-5+lenny1,
the last opensc working wit
Il giorno mer, 08/09/2010 alle 22.26 +0200, jons...@terra.es ha scritto:
...
> > I'm very curious about SM in DNIe , is it used in normal operations
> by
> > the card holder (passing PIN, PKCS1 encryption) ?
> Yes.
Ok, the same happens for italian CNS cards.
> > In that case, SM uses symmetric c
Viktor TARASOV wrote:
Aventra development wrote:
pkcs11-tool works, but pkcs#11 module does not when using Firefox).
Other problems with firefox is that certificate enrollment does not
work when using the pkcs#11 module, e.g. when using this site:
pkitest.gdm.de/starsign
Actually in MyEID
Mensaje original
> De: alejandro@gmail.com
> Fecha: 12/09/2010 12:09
> Para:
> Asunto: Re: [opensc-devel] Rv: OpenSC-0.12.0 and Spanish DNIe
> 2010/9/10 jons...@terra.es :
> > I've checked this behaviour in the same computer and three different card
> > readers:
> > ( Dell Studio
Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> actually pkcs15init takes into account the possibility of multiple ACLs for
> one operation.
> Is it really used?
>
> Multiple ACLs appear as linked list associated to operation, for example,
> when loading generic profile 'pkcs15' and then the card specific one.
>
More
Hello,
I created a Visual Studio 2010 solution for OpenSC. It can use the debug mode
with breakpoints. And also out a release. I try to make this version to be
usable by all people without much change in configuration of Visual Studio. I
am trying to do the documentation for installing and us
Hello,
On Sep 12, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Peter Koch wrote:
> pkcs15-tcos.c has not been modified for a long time (except some
> minor cosmetic changes). So something else must have changed.
Correct.
> I just did a quick "grep LOGIN_REQUIRED *.c" and it seems that only
> the WestCOS and OpenPGP emulat
Martin Paljak wrote:
> If the microSD interface will be vendor specific,
I think it is, sorta.
> there will be a need for something like OpenCT, which will not be
> very nice.
Yes.
> Something similar to what CCID is for USB is needed for microSD, so
> that support could exist without (binar
Martin Paljak wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Peter Koch wrote:
>> I got two testcards from certgate in 2008. One was java-based
>> and one contained a TCOS3-chip. They were planning to offer
>> an ifd-handler for linux. Since OpenSC has TCOS3 support this
>> microSD-card might work in combin
On Sep 12, 2010, at 8:42 PM, Peter Koch wrote:
> I got two testcards from certgate in 2008. One was java-based
> and one contained a TCOS3-chip. They were planning to offer
> an ifd-handler for linux. Since OpenSC has TCOS3 support this
> microSD-card might work in combination with PCSClite and a
>
JEAN Guillaume wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Here is a patch that fixes the problem debug level 9 in the cardmod. Two
> small error in the function parameter.
>
Thank you for the patch, it has been applied in r4701.
> Sincerlly,
> GJean
>
Kind wishes,
Viktor.
>
>
>
>
>
Hello,
On Sep 13, 2010, at 12:19 AM, Peter Koch wrote:
> tcos_init() does NOT set card->max_recv_size and therefore
> some default value (i.e. 256) was used.
>
> With current svn this does not work anymore. sc_read_binary()
> checks wether count > card->max_recv_size and then tries
> to read count
Martin Paljak wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
>
> I suggest to let card drivers blindly set max sizes and only further limit
> them in card.c if reader has also limitations.
I do not have deep insight into the readers capacities, but for me
it looks like an optimal solu
23 matches
Mail list logo
