Hello
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 18:07, Douglas E. Engert deeng...@anl.gov wrote:
With OpenSSL-1.0.0a pkcs11-tool -M shows:
Supported mechanisms:
RSA-PKCS-KEY-PAIR-GEN, keySize={1024,3072}, keypairgen
Without OPenSSL, pkc11-tool -M
RSA-PKCS, keySize={1024,3072}, sign, unwrap, decrypt
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 23:08, Andre Zepezauer
andre.zepeza...@student.uni-halle.de wrote:
Attached is the final patch. Naming of flags as mentioned above. All
changes were trivial with the exception of pkcs15init/pkcs15-oberthur.c
Thanks!
Commited in r4788 [1]
[1]
On 10/5/2010 10:04 AM, Martin Paljak wrote:
Hello
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 18:07, Douglas E. Engertdeeng...@anl.gov wrote:
With OpenSSL-1.0.0a pkcs11-tool -M shows:
Supported mechanisms:
RSA-PKCS-KEY-PAIR-GEN, keySize={1024,3072}, keypairgen
Without OPenSSL, pkc11-tool -M
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:54, Viktor TARASOV
viktor.tara...@opentrust.com wrote:
Actually in 'reader-pcsc', when getting the reader's list, the
SCardConnect(SCARD_SHARE_DIRECT) is called for every reader. So, when
one process holds the first reader, the second process cannot access the
On Thursday, September 30 at 12:02PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
The code (also needs a patched version of OpenSSL) is much more
extensive than other SM cards in opensc-sm.trunk, that's why I doubt
that there is a chance of integrating the nPA into OpenSC.
What are the limitations in OpenSC?
1.
Martin,
Waiting for your decision.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alon.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Martin Paljak mar...@paljak.pri.ee wrote:
But... the only dependency we require is xsltproc, so maybe we can
rethink this... Provided you agree that
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 18:56, Douglas E. Engert deeng...@anl.gov wrote:
On 10/5/2010 10:04 AM, Martin Paljak wrote:
Hello
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 18:07, Douglas E. Engertdeeng...@anl.gov wrote:
With OpenSSL-1.0.0a pkcs11-tool -M shows:
Supported mechanisms:
RSA-PKCS-KEY-PAIR-GEN,
(Frank, you're not subscribed to opensc-devel mailing list, which is not a good
idea if you want to send mails here. I rescued the e-mail from moderation
because it is probably of interest to others as well (unlike the viagra and
your wife photos attached ones :) but you really should
Hello,
On Oct 5, 2010, at 7:34 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Martin,
Waiting for your decision.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Alon Bar-Lev alon.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
make dist: require xsltproc, docbook-xsl, don't require playing with
symlinks (assumes/requires running from version
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Martin Paljak mar...@paljak.pri.ee wrote:
Personally I don't mind simplicity in build files. 99% of people run binaries
or packages, 99% of people who don't run binary packages on Linux know what
they are doing. Or won't mind downloading an extra few packages
10 matches
Mail list logo
