Dan Lukes wrote:
> >> - printf("expecting %lu, got only %d bytes.\n", len, r);
> >> + printf("expecting %u, got only %d bytes.\n", len, r);
>
> > In fact the correct answer is %zu [1]
> > But this does not work on Windows.
>
> Then use %llu and cast len to unsigned lon
Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote:
> I having a problem with CAcert certificates when they contains
> email=123123123123123. But it could be anything.
>
> How to debug this kind of issue using OpenSSL engine pkcs11? Or can
> anyone guide me during debugging?
You would have to explain what the probl
Hello,
I having a problem with CAcert certificates when they contains
email=123123123123123. But it could be anything.
How to debug this kind of issue using OpenSSL engine pkcs11? Or can
anyone guide me during debugging?
Kind regards,
--
Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.
On 02/06/11 20:23, Ludovic Rousseau:
>> Revert r5137, because size_t is defined as unsigned integer type (without
>> further qualification).
>> - printf("expecting %lu, got only %d bytes.\n", len, r);
>> + printf("expecting %u, got only %d bytes.\n", len, r);
> In fac
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:23 +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> 2011/2/6 :
> > Revision: 5185
> > Author: andre
> > Date: 2011-02-06 17:28:30 + (Sun, 06 Feb 2011)
> >
> > Log Message:
> > ---
> > Revert r5137, because size_t is defined as unsigned integer type (without
> > further
2011/1/15 Lionel Elie Mamane :
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 03:14:54PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag 06 Januar 2011, um 14:57:35 schrieb Peter Stuge:
>
>>> I also think the lists. name is important to drop, but having a
>>> canonical address is much more important.
>
>> Implemente
2011/2/6 :
> Revision: 5185
> Author: andre
> Date: 2011-02-06 17:28:30 + (Sun, 06 Feb 2011)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> Revert r5137, because size_t is defined as unsigned integer type (without
> further qualification).
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/95399/basedefs/st
