Re: [opensc-devel] Cryptotech Setcos card signing problem

2011-08-16 Thread TMS Brokers / Łukasz Kościesza
-Original Message- From: Viktor Tarasov [mailto:viktor.tara...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 10:34 PM To: TMS Brokers / Łukasz Kościesza Cc: Douglas E. Engert; opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] Cryptotech Setcos card signing problem Hello, Le

Re: [opensc-devel] PIN caching problems with pkcs11-helper 1.08

2011-08-16 Thread Jonatan Åkerlind
On fre, 2011-08-12 at 23:20 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Jonatan, Can you please try the attached patch and see if it helps? Thanks! ... seems to work fine, will continue testing during the day. This is on an AMD64 architecture if it makes any difference. So far i have only entered my PIN

[opensc-devel] PCSC spy tool: should I include it in the pcsc-lite distribution?

2011-08-16 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
Hello, I am working on a new way to log/spy PCSC calls. The two previous methods [1, 2] are not satisfying because of their limitations. My question: should I include the spy layer in the standard pcsc-lite archive or as a distinct project? Pros of the merge: - PCSC spy layer available in

Re: [opensc-devel] PIN caching problems with pkcs11-helper 1.08

2011-08-16 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Thanks for your report and testing! 2011/8/16 Jonatan Åkerlind jonatan.akerl...@sgsstudentbostader.se: On fre, 2011-08-12 at 23:20 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Jonatan, Can you please try the attached patch and see if it helps? Thanks! ... seems to work fine, will continue testing during the

Re: [opensc-devel] Rationale for Microsoft's MiniDriver

2011-08-16 Thread Douglas E. Engert
On 8/13/2011 11:20 PM, Anders Rundgren wrote: Writing card drivers is quite difficult. That's why Microsoft introduced the MiniDriver. The driver model has been very successful for printers since printers have widely different characteristics. Cryptographic operations OTOH leave very

Re: [opensc-devel] Rationale for Microsoft's MiniDriver

2011-08-16 Thread Martin Paljak
On Aug 16, 2011, at 6:16 , Douglas E. Engert wrote: With a fully unified card API you can target all cards with a fairly simple test-suite and delegate the certification to the card vendors. This should dramatically improve system reliability which always has been a weak point, particularly

Re: [opensc-devel] Rationale for Microsoft's MiniDriver

2011-08-16 Thread Douglas E. Engert
On 8/14/2011 10:40 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2011-08-14 08:59, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: There had been always unified API: PKCS#11. Well, at Microsoft environment there was CryptoAPI Provider. The good about the CryptoAPI is that it allowed enough flexibility so that, for example, you could

[opensc-devel] pkcs11-helper-1.09 released

2011-08-16 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, pkcs11-helper-1.09 is available. Fixed issue introduced in 1.08 related to OpenSSL engine signature. ChangeLog 2011-08-16 - Version 1.09 * Do not retry if CKR_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL and none NULL target. * Fixup OpenSSL engine's rsa_priv_enc to use RSA size output buffer.

Re: [opensc-devel] Rationale for Microsoft's MiniDriver

2011-08-16 Thread Anders Rundgren
On 2011-08-16 17:33, Douglas E. Engert wrote: On 8/14/2011 10:40 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2011-08-14 08:59, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: There had been always unified API: PKCS#11. Well, at Microsoft environment there was CryptoAPI Provider. The good about the CryptoAPI is that it allowed