Re: [opensc-devel] Questions for first-time CardOS chip acquisition and linux-centric management

2011-08-29 Thread Martin Paljak
Hello, On Aug 29, 2011, at 10:02 , LinuxChuck wrote: > Allow me to start by announcing that I am new to PKI smart-card > management with OpenSC, and have only had experience working with > Aladdin eToken devices and their proprietary middleware. However, I > am fairly well versed in the concepts a

[opensc-devel] Questions for first-time CardOS chip acquisition and linux-centric management

2011-08-29 Thread LinuxChuck
Hello, Allow me to start by announcing that I am new to PKI smart-card management with OpenSC, and have only had experience working with Aladdin eToken devices and their proprietary middleware. However, I am fairly well versed in the concepts and fundamentals of PKI in general. I've been reading

Re: [opensc-devel] Minidriver in 'write' mode

2011-08-29 Thread Viktor Tarasov
Le 14/08/2011 13:57, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE a écrit : >> PKCS#15 card producers resolve this problem by >> creating parallel CSP file system, invisible for PKCS#15, >> or by creating 'DATA' objects with the common 'application' attribute, >> for ex. "BaseCSP". >> >> I guess that this second appr

Re: [opensc-devel] Half OT: PKCS#11+Mozilla

2011-08-29 Thread Douglas E. Engert
On 8/29/2011 2:08 AM, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote: > I alreay see that links and, as i told you earlier, must be a > Mozilla/NSS bad implementation, cause it asks again and again, no > matter if CKR_OK or CKR_INVALID_ATTRIBUTE. They must be not caching the result. It should not be must overhead

Re: [opensc-devel] Half OT: PKCS#11+Mozilla

2011-08-29 Thread helpcrypto helpcrypto
I alreay see that links and, as i told you earlier, must be a Mozilla/NSS bad implementation, cause it asks again and again, no matter if CKR_OK or CKR_INVALID_ATTRIBUTE. anyway, ill argue this things with the mozilla people. Thanks a lot for your time and help. Much appreciatted. 2011/8/26 Dougla