Le 14 mars 2012 18:56, Peter Stuge a écrit :
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>> So I used the OpenSC documentation at [2] and rebased my staging
>> branch (from [3]) onto gerrit/staging.
>
> Note that gerrit/staging is a so-called remote tracking branch, and
> it's best not to commit to those to avoid c
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Change 2 now merged.
Ok!
> I also tried with change 3
> https://www.opensc-project.org/codereview/#change,3 but I get the
> error:
> "Gerrit Code Review 8:45 PM
>
> Change cannot be merged due to unsatisfiable dependencies.
>
> The following dependency error
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> So I used the OpenSC documentation at [2] and rebased my staging
> branch (from [3]) onto gerrit/staging.
Note that gerrit/staging is a so-called remote tracking branch, and
it's best not to commit to those to avoid conflicts if other changes
arrive from the remote than t
Hello git experts :-)
I try to update change 6 [1] so that gerrit is happy.
For now the error is:
"Gerrit Code Review 4:21 PM
Project policy requires all submissions to be a fast-forward.
Please rebase the change locally and upload again for review."
So I used the OpenSC documentat
Le 14 mars 2012 09:59, Viktor Tarasov a écrit :
> Commit 51630a844e8e95e7108cb1966c5f3e21b93a463b is the last common commit
> for OpenSC/OpenSC.git(staging) and gerrit's repo.
> (By the way, this commit where not submitted to OpenSC.git by gerrit --
> there is no Change-Id in comments)
>
> Two las
Le mercredi 14 mars 2012 à 10:36 -0500, Douglas E. Engert a écrit :
> Rather the stating from zero, or taking a very large branch with many
> little patches,
> would it be better to have the authors of these patches combine them
> into one or
> a hand full of larger patches? For example my ECDH wa
Good to see Ludovic and Peter making progress, Thanks!"
Rather the stating from zero, or taking a very large branch with many little
patches,
would it be better to have the authors of these patches combine them into one or
a hand full of larger patches? For example my ECDH was 4 separate patches
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Peter Stuge wrote:
> > I made an attempt to kick change 1 loose.
>
> Ok, so that worked. It would work fine to repeat this for each
> change, even if it is a bit labour intensive at least now, to clear
> the backlog. I've done it also for chan
