Thanks Andreas!
2009/10/20 Andreas Jellinghaus
> Hi David,
>
> thanks for both patches, they look good to me so I applied them
> right away.
>
> Regards, Andreas
> ___
> opensc-devel mailing list
> opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
> http://www.ope
t;
That could be an acceptable failure scenario in the libp11 case
because it doesn't seem like it's meant to be thread safe (it's
supposed to be a simplification layer...) At any rate, the libp11 devs
should fill us in how they want it to be handled.
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:45 AM, D
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> For the C_Initialize() patch... If you got already initialize you
> should not call C_Finalize.
Can you explain more? How should the handling look like with libp11?
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:23 AM, David Smith
> w
not be bubbled up to the caller.
Please take a look,
- dds
commit 26891c363bc4fa2abcb768cd149c77228cb60d30
Author: David Smith
Date: Tue Oct 20 17:56:36 2009 +0900
Fix pin length handling to prevent segfault from cleansing.
When using OPENSSL_cleanse on a strdup()'d pin, the c
ibp11 and engine-pkcs11, so I've attached a patch that adds a new
function in libp11, PKCS11_CTX_init_args, and a new engine command,
CMD_INIT_ARGS.
Thanks,
- dds
From 02d2934a6d7ec67aacdfe556f88e89ceb51a14c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 J
