On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Ludovic Rousseau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Maybe a better solution is to NOT return an error code in case
>> "$DAEMON shutdown" fails because no status file is found.
>> Than patch is simple:
>> Index: src/tools/openct
* Ludovic Rousseau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks!
> > Do whatever you think right, but I don't think that searching for a
> > specific file is correct, just let the command fail.
>
> Letting the command fail will al
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "let the command fail" -> I meant ignore... :)
> Yes, I agree that this solution is the best one.
Commited in revision 1074.
Bye
--
Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
___
opensc-devel maili
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks!
> Do whatever you think right, but I don't think that searching for a
> specific file is correct, just let the command fail.
Letting the command fail will also make the caller fail.
For example when you upgrade a D
"let the command fail" -> I meant ignore... :)
Yes, I agree that this solution is the best one.
On 8/11/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks!
> > Do whatever you think right, but I don't think that s
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand... the 'echo "."' will always set $? to 0... So how
> come the script returns 1?
The script uses "set -e" so the interpreting shell will stop on the
first error returned by an executed command.
If "$DAEM
I don't understand... the 'echo "."' will always set $? to 0... So how
come the script returns 1?
On 8/11/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello list,
>
> Hello Eric and Wouter,
>
> > A debian user poi
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list,
Hello Eric and Wouter,
> A debian user pointed this out bug and it's actually a bug in the init
> script exiting with status 1 when you call stop and it's already
> stopped. This is against the LSB standard as
tags 494385 patch
thanks
Hello list,
A debian user pointed this out bug and it's actually a bug in the init
script exiting with status 1 when you call stop and it's already
stopped. This is against the LSB standard as well
(http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-gen
