Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-10 Thread Peter Stuge
Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > >> I don't know where the "Gerrit's review directory" is and could not > >> find a gerrit config file. > > > > ps www $(pidof java) > > $ pidof java > 24079 > > $ ps www $(pidof java) > PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND > 24079 pts/2Sl+ 29:22 java -jar jenkins.war

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-10 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2012/6/9 Peter Stuge : > Ludovic Rousseau wrote: >> I don't know where the "Gerrit's review directory" is and could not >> find a gerrit config file. > > ps www $(pidof java) $ pidof java 24079 $ ps www $(pidof java) PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND 24079 pts/2Sl+ 29:22 java -jar jenkins.

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-10 Thread Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE
> I was ready to do it, but as you know, > have no sufficient rights on gerrit and jenkins connected to > opensc-project.org . I suggest that we should share resources and administration. With Viktor, we volunteer to build daily packages from GIThub using our own infrastructure, using opensc.fr

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-09 Thread Peter Stuge
Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > I don't know where the "Gerrit's review directory" is and could not > find a gerrit config file. ps www $(pidof java) //Peter ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/ma

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-09 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2012/6/9 Viktor Tarasov : > Le 05/06/2012 09:38, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> 2012/6/5 Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE : >>> But my question is: >>> * Are we still using gerrit? >>> * Is gerrit synced? >>> >>> After hearing the community answers, I will rewrite this later today. >> As far a

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-09 Thread Viktor Tarasov
Le 05/06/2012 09:38, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit : > Hello, > > 2012/6/5 Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE : >> But my question is: >> * Are we still using gerrit? >> * Is gerrit synced? >> >> After hearing the community answers, I will rewrite this later today. > As far as I understand the situation: > 1- gi

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-05 Thread Magosányi, Árpád
On 06/05/2012 09:38 AM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > Hello, [...] > 3- the idea is to start gerrit with a new clean copy of what is on github > > The problem now is to find manpower (and expertise) to implement point 3. I have taken a look into it. It seems simple at first sight. Basically you just n

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-05 Thread Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE
Dear Ludovic, > As far as I understand the situation: > 1- github and gerrit has diverged too much and need to be resync > manually > 2- a lot of work has been invested in the staging branch on github and > should not be lost > 3- the idea is to start gerrit with a new clean copy of what is on > g

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-05 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
Hello, 2012/6/5 Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE : > But my question is: > * Are we still using gerrit? > * Is gerrit synced? > > After hearing the community answers, I will rewrite this later today. As far as I understand the situation: 1- github and gerrit has diverged too much and need to be resync m

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-05 Thread Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE
> == Development process == > == Using github == > == Using gerrit == I switched development process in two: github and gerrit http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/GetInvolved Please review ... The last commit log suggest that github is now the main development tool. On paper, gerrit is **

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-04 Thread Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE
> Do you agree that it's difficult to propose to remove something you > don't know what it is for? :) Sure :) > The hook creates the Change-Id for gerrit, allowing a logical change > to be tracked across multiple iterations of the actual commit e.g. in > response to review. OK. I readded the sc

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-04 Thread Peter Stuge
Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote: > * Do we still fetch opensc-project development hooks? > scp -p -P 8882 www.opensc-project.org:hooks/commit-msg .git/hooks/ s > I don't know what it is for and propose to remove it. Do you agree that it's difficult to propose to remove something you don't know wha

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-04 Thread Peter Stuge
Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote: > do you confirm that anyone can now make a pull request using only GIThub? As you know I for one am strongly against centering anything around the github workflow, especially when gerrit is available. //Peter ___ opens

Re: [opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-04 Thread Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE
> GetInvolved page Could you review https://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/GetInvolved I added a few lines about GIThub OpenSC project. Next questions: * Do we still fetch opensc-project development hooks? scp -p -P 8882 www.opensc-project.org:hooks/commit-msg .git/hooks/ s I don't know wha

[opensc-devel] GetInvolved wiki page

2012-06-04 Thread Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE
Dear all, I would like to rewrite the GetInvolved page on the wiki to give developers a clear information. The idea is to migrate some of this information: http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/DevelopmentPolicy#Movingmasterforward. to the GetInvolved front page. My first question is about G