Douglas E. Engert wrote:
But even if thats not your problem, it will be a problem in the future
for someone.
Maybe. So long as card provisioning is perceived as necessarily
stovepiped it's probably not going to arise; USG isn't going to slap a
PIV model on your bank-issued card; they're goi
Douglas E. Engert wrote:
Looking at this from the user's point of view, If the card has more then
one on-card application, how does the user express which one is to be used?
No no no. The user has two cards. Both are the same card stock. Each
card has different on-card applications on it h
Timothy J. Miller wrote:
> Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>
>> Looking at this from the user's point of view, If the card has more then
>> one on-card application, how does the user express which one is to be
>> used?
The OpenSC should not have a problem, as long as the drivers look for
their applic
Timothy J Miller wrote:
> This is sort of a general question. I should probably have CC:'d the
> MUSCLE list as well, but there's a lot of overlap with this one, so here
> goes:
>
> There was a time when each card had a fixed data model. This is no
> longer true; card data models are now ab
On 25.11.2008, at 0:31, Timothy J. Miller wrote:
> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>
>> Using the ATR to identify a service on a card may have worked in the
>> past but it is really not a good idea now.
>
> Unfortunately it's written into the specs.
>
>> I don't think I will implement the PCSC v2 part 6 (
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Using the ATR to identify a service on a card may have worked in the
past but it is really not a good idea now.
Unfortunately it's written into the specs.
I don't think I will implement the PCSC v2 part 6 (ICC Service
Provider) inside pcsc-lite.
I thought pcsc-lite
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Timothy J Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is sort of a general question. I should probably have CC:'d the MUSCLE
> list as well, but there's a lot of overlap with this one, so here goes:
>
> There was a time when each card had a fixed data model. This is
This is sort of a general question. I should probably have CC:'d the
MUSCLE list as well, but there's a lot of overlap with this one, so
here goes:
There was a time when each card had a fixed data model. This is no
longer true; card data models are now abstracted through the use of on-
c
